Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Make your predictions — WEC 50: 8/18 Las Vegas

By Zach Arnold | August 17, 2010

Print Friendly and PDF

Dark matches

Main card

Topics: Media, MMA, WEC, Zach Arnold | 14 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

14 Responses to “Make your predictions — WEC 50: 8/18 Las Vegas”

  1. 45 Huddle says:

    Faber getting injured hurt this card. Not like there was much doubt on who would win the 2 big fights on this card.

    The Jorgensen fight is interesting.

    The next WEC card is much much better.

    • Oh Yeah says:

      This one will still be a great show without Faber.

      Every WEC seems to outshine the UFC cards for skill + action. I don’t know who half of the guys are since the divisions are so new yet the fights are captivating.

      WEC is mainly lacking in star power, audience buzz, and crippling KO power.

  2. Why is Javier Vazquez on the unaired undercard while a bunch of journeymen make TV? Main event is sorta interesting and that’s it.

    • edub says:

      Gotta agree.

      Why in the world is Micklewright vs. Palawsusfnaiodfhawski on the main card!?

      • That fight confuses me most. Like, okay, one guy is a prospect – But isn’t Semerzier? I’m not watching some MMA show so that in case the fight I really want to see ends early, I might get to see it. Instead, we get Cub Swanson. does anyone really care about seeing that guy fight?

        • edub says:

          And on top of that the prospect(Micklewright) is in a division that while being exciting is obviously not on par with the UFC or even SF.

          I’m actually getting more angry thinking about this. Vasquez vs. Semerzier is definately a main card fight.

  3. Warren Amos says:

    People I’m rooting for, more than who I predict to win (predicting WEC cards is difficult due to newcomers/unknowns):

    Benavidez, Roller, Mendes, Pickett, Mickelwright

  4. jj says:

    Zach Micklewright via decision
    Scott Jorgensen via decision
    Cub Swanson via tko
    Anthony Pettis via submission
    Dominick Cruz via decision

    • edub says:

      Damn Cub with the big time upset eh…

      • jj says:

        big time upset? that’s a stretch since really the only way chad wins that fight is by a lnp decision win. I decided to go with my heart and choose the cub tko win even though my head says it will be a decision win for mendes.

        • edub says:

          Well those are some valid points, but I was speaking more towards the betting lines. Most sites I have seen Mendes is a huge favorite. Also everytime Cub has had a chance to shine against a big name(Mendes obviously isn’t a big name yet, but huge prospect) he has wilted under the bright lights.

  5. edub says:

    And a great performance by Vasquez that we might not get to see.

  6. Steve4192 says:

    Pettis looked like a star in the making.

    Stuffed every shot Roller attempted (even took him down a couple of times), landed a couple of flashy Capoeira kicks (one of which hurt Roller badly), and then finished him off with a lightning fast triangle in the final seconds of the fight.

    He’s a lot like Donald Cerrone, except he seems to be improving by leaps and bounds every time he fights while Cerrone is basically the same guy he has always been.

    I can’t wait for Smooth versus Showtime.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image