Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Hidehiko Yoshida vs. Sanae Kikuta booked for Sengoku 1/4 Saitama event

By Zach Arnold | November 17, 2008

Print Friendly and PDF

Basic event notes here.

On a marketing and interest level, this is not an appealing main-event match. It is an even stranger booking decision when you consider the following:

Kikuta last fought in June against Chris Rice on the Sengoku 3 show. Yet, he is ‘rewarded’ with the main event slot against Yoshida? When this fight happens, it will be Kikuta’s third fight in the last two years.

Further compounding the absurdity is Takanori Gomi facing Satoru Kitaoka in a top slot on the same card, right after Gomi lost to Sergey Golyaev in a lackluster display of fighting spirit on the same 11/1 Saitama show.

Topics: Japan, Media, MMA, Sengoku, Zach Arnold | 9 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

9 Responses to “Hidehiko Yoshida vs. Sanae Kikuta booked for Sengoku 1/4 Saitama event”

  1. Ivan Trembow says:

    Yoshida’s opponent is Sanae Kikuta? Is that the best they can come up with? And isn’t he much smaller than Yoshida? Yoshida was absolutely destroyed by Josh Barnett and it the beating was just brutal. It’s questionable whether he should even be fighting after the beatings that he has taken and the Barnett beating in particular.

    It is also ridiculous that the title match is Kitaoka vs. Gomi instead of Kitaoka vs. Golyaev. I know that the survival of the company is dependent on the ratings of the January 4th show, but it’s still ridiculous to have Kitaoka vs. Gomi as a title fight. They could have booked Gomi against someone else in a non-title fight, while still booking Kitaoka vs. Golyaev in a title fight. Then, if Gomi wins impressively and if the company is still in business for another event, THEN maybe you could give him a title shot, but not right after a loss.

  2. sprewell says:

    Yoshida didn’t really take a beating at all in the Barnett fight, and yeah, he should still be fighting because he’s the most popular fighter they have bby far.

  3. 45 Huddle says:

    I won’t be sad when this company folds. Hopefully their few top fighters will move over to DREAM.

  4. The Gaijin says:

    Did you mean the Josh Thompson fight Ivan? The Barnett fight was more of a catch-wrestling/”real” UWF fight wasn’t it?

  5. Fightlinker says:

    Yeah the barnett fight was pathetic. Barnett asked Yoshida three times if he was ‘okay’. Am I wrong to want my MMA fighters to give it their all regardless of the respect level between them?

  6. Ivan Trembow says:

    The James Thompson fight was brutal, too, but not as much of a sustained beating for three rounds as the Barnett fight. You could tell that Barnett felt bad about brutalizing Yoshida (ie, asking “are you okay?” which I agree you shouldn’t do), but the beating kept on going.

  7. Zack says:

    “right after Gomi lost to Sergey Golyaev in a lackluster display of fighting spirit on the same 11/1 Saitama show.”

    The fight was actually pretty good, and Gomi got robbed.

  8. fight says:

    I think Golyaev was paid to lose that fight, and that is the only reason he didnt finish Gomi off.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image