Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Klitschko or Kimbo?

By Zach Arnold | February 26, 2008

Print Friendly and PDF

That was the question asked today by Tony Kornheiser and Michael Wilbon on ESPN.

The fact is, amongst the various American sportswriters (for better or for worse), Kimbo Slice is the symbol of MMA. Both Kornheiser and Wilbon called MMA “savagery” on TV.

Audio here.

Topics: Boxing, Media, MMA, Pro Elite, Zach Arnold | 5 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

5 Responses to “Klitschko or Kimbo?”

  1. GassedOut says:

    Wow, that’s like saying the Edsel represents all cars…it’s savagery, I tell ya!

  2. garth says:

    I love savagery. Remember when Chuck savaged Babalu so bad, Renato tried to single-leg the ref.
    Nnnow that’s good savagery.

  3. StreitigKaiser says:

    Savagery beats fixed boxing decisions anyday. Boxing is dying; just watch Kimbo vs. Mercer.

  4. Ivan Trembow says:

    It’s interesting to see how their attitudes have changed about MMA in the past few years. Wilbon appeared to give both MMA and NASCAR a chance after not attempting to watch either of them for years, but at least now now he’s talking about MMA as something that he’s missing out on because he can’t watch it (ie, he talks as if there’s something wrong with him for not being able to watch it, as opposed to there being something wrong with the sport itself).

    He also knows enough to sound semi-knowledgeable (or not completely un-educated on the subject) if MMA comes up in conversation on the air with someone like Dan Le Betard who actually is an MMA fan. (ie, Wilbon will say, “I want to see Rampage fight so-and-so.”)

    Kornheiser also says that he can’t watch it, but that’s not surprising because he is in his 50s and even the UFC has poor ratings in the over-50 demographic (Wilbon is almost 50 himself). Kornheiser’s attitude on this has changed as well, in the sense that today he said that he can’t stomach it because he’s “just too old.” Again, he talks as if there’s something wrong with him for not being able to stomach it, as opposed to there being something wrong with the sport itself.

  5. ttt says:

    that show is great, even if you don’t agree with their opinions, it’s a great way to catch up on mainstream sports .. they put their show up on the podcast everyday

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image