Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Quote of the Day – Brock Lesnar

By Zach Arnold | August 15, 2008

Print Friendly and PDF

He was recently interviewed by The New York Times:

Q: How do you respond to critics who say that you have not “paid your dues,” in that the only reason your fights have been televised twice is because of your name and not necessarily your skill?

A: A lot of people lose sight of the bottom line: this is a business. It’s about making dollars by selling tickets, Pay-Per-Views, and merchandise. It’s up to the promoter to decide what is televised. I just train hard, then get in the octagon and fight.

In regard to the “You haven’t paid your dues” stuff: sure, I came into this sport with a name, but I didn’t just build my name and my reputation in pro wrestling. I also came in with twenty years of amateur wrestling experience.

Topics: Media, MMA, UFC, Zach Arnold | 8 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

8 Responses to “Quote of the Day – Brock Lesnar”

  1. GassedOut says:

    You know, I’ve said it before…Brock Lesnar is taking MMA seriously. What he showed on Saturday night was the first glimmer that we might want to take him seriously as a fighter, poor ring conduct notwithstanding.

  2. Rollo the Cat says:

    MMA is not like other sports. A guy who has trained and competed in amateur wrestling for as long as he has is not a novice. I wouldn’t say the same thing about a boxer, but a wrestler already has a good portion of the most important skills for MMA.

  3. GassedOut says:

    True dat, Rollo

  4. cyph says:

    A pure wrestler will beat a pure boxer in a straight up fight. Proven since the beginning of time.

  5. Just to second Rollo’s opinion… One of those Ms in MMA stands for “Mixed.” Being a good mixed martial artist is about having a variety of skills. Of them being wrestling. When you’re 285, likely have more real strength then anyone in the sport, and an elite level wrestler you already have a “gold star” in one aspect of the sport.

    Sure his striking, submissions, stand-up defense and guard could use some work, but every fighter need to improve on those things to varying degrees.

    Being an elite level wrestler with freakish strength already gives him a better chance than a lot of people.

    Look at someone like Matt Hammill who had shit for skills but could wrestle. A few fights later he’s schooling* Michael Bisping.

  6. Jeremy (not that Jeremy) says:

    Well, Hammill had the same skill set as his rock star mentor.

    If Lesnar’s stand up striking is lacking, I fear for the lives of anyone to meet him once it’s “merely adequate.”

  7. Kelvin says:

    I give Brock madd props.

  8. MickDawg says:

    I understand…and agree…with everything in that quote.

    I do hope he gets some better striking, or better submissions, though.

    I would like to see him get some finishing moves.

    I don’t want to see him simply control guys for 3 rounds every time out.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image