Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Transparently glaring

By Zach Arnold | March 19, 2006

Print Friendly and PDF

By Zach Arnold

A few days ago, we linked to several newspaper articles in the Chronicle Herald newspaper (based out of Halifax, Nova Scotia in Canada). It was an article series on an upcoming MMA event being regulated by the local boxing commission. I noted that at least one of the articles (which was more or less an op-ed) was negative against the event taking place. The other two articles were written by Monty Mosher, who was doing “straight” reporting of the facts.

On Sunday, Mosher’s true feelings on the MMA show were revealed in the newspaper (almost as a side note). What is the point in hiding your true feelings on your reporting for at least four days? If you have an opinion to make, state it openly and promptly along with your “straight” reporting. I am not advocating a mixture of opinion and “straight” reporting, but one article in particular was more or less a mixture of both. Separate, but equal are good words to live by.

Topics: All Topics, MMA, Zach Arnold | No Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image