Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

The legal battle in Hawaii continues

By Zach Arnold | February 18, 2006

Print Friendly and PDF

By Zach Arnold

There’s good news and bad news, according to a report in Saturday’s edition of The Honolulu Advertiser. Writer Treena Shapiro notes that legislation to try to cripple MMA in Hawaii has been stalled:

A prohibition on mixed martial arts fighting is also essentially dead for the year, as is a bill that would allow police to issue licenses so residents can carry concealed weapons.

That’s the good news. Here’s the bad news.

Waters, D-51st (Waimanalo, Lanikai), who introduced the mixed martial arts bills and the traffic fine surcharge, said he will look for opportunities to resurrect the measures this year, particularly those aimed at getting more money to county law enforcement.

Otherwise, he plans to introduce the bills again next session.

“Sometimes these things take more than a year to gain steam,” he said.

Topics: All Topics, MMA, Zach Arnold | 1 Comment » | Permalink | Trackback |

One Response to “The legal battle in Hawaii continues”

  1. HijoDelOso says:

    “Sometimes these things take more than a year to gain steam,” he said.

    The mma promoters in Hawaii have earned a reprieve but not a victory. If they have any concern for their long term survival, they will get lobbyists and lawyers on the case right now. They need to start refuting potential arguments, bring in supportive data and get grass roots support for mma as legitimate sport. The first thing I would do is see if someone like Mark Ratner of the NSAC would be amendable to to being a freindly information source. California based everything on the UFC and NSAC so perhaps the Hawaiian contingent could use the same tactic. Indeed, the UFC might even be willing to be supportive–but probably only if they ever see Hawaii as a ppv future location (which I think is a good idea).

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image