Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Josh Gross


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Lowkick


Liver Kick


Caged In


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


Fightlinker


Fightnomics


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


MMA Convert


Fightline


Fight Medicine


CompuStrike


MMA Frenzy


Fighters


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


MMA Dude Bro


Sherdog Radio


The Fightworks Podcast


Eddie Goldman


Pro MMA Radio


MMA Torch


Video Corner


Fight Hub


The Fight Nerd


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

Site Meter

« | Home | »

Fox Sports goes all-in for the kill on Ronda Rousey’s UFC career

By Zach Arnold | January 5, 2017

Print Friendly and PDF

Ari Emanuel reportedly wants to give TV networks more production & creative control over UFC for the next big television package. Be careful what you wish for.

Ronda Rousey, the UFC’s golden child whom WME-IMG had the double squeeze of juice on as both promoter and manager, is getting savaged by the UFC’s television partner. The hit men of Jamie Horowitz are ripping through the carcass.

Lorenzo Fertitta would have never let this happen under his watch. In six months time, things have dramatically changed for the UFC and not all for the better. Creative control was an absolute core belief under Zuffa’s tenure that helped sell UFC for $4 billion dollars. There was a reason that this was so important. Anyone who watched WCW a generation earlier and read the voluminous reports about Turner’s “standards and practices” knows all too well how powerful creative control is.

A week after Ronda Rousey’s decisive loss to Amanda Nunes, the verbal insanity has gone through the roof. The millionaire sports pundits smell blood in the water.

Voice #1 – Dana White

Within 45 minutes of Amanda Nunes retaining her UFC Bantamweight title, Dana White went on Fox Sports 1 television and made an ass out of himself. He bragged about how big the crowd at T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas was and went on one of his “this is why I’m the promoter and you’re not speeches.” And during his rant, White stated that he could have spent $100 million dollars in advertising on Amanda Nunes for UFC 207 and nobody would have known who she was.

Dana’s theory? Fighting Ronda Rousey would make Amanda Nunes a bigger star than any ad buy UFC could ever deliver. In other words, purposely push Amanda Nunes as the b-sider and expect that defeating the A-level face of the company would instantly transfer the energy over to the b-sider. If this strategy worked, Holly Holm wouldn’t have been fighting on free television and Al Haymon would be the king of boxing.

So where was the Ronda bashing here? It wasn’t Dana bashing Ronda so much as it was a media portrait being painted after the fight of a prized former champion who somehow is an emotionally stunted little child crying for 45 minutes with boogers and snot coming out. Paired with Ronda’s refusal to deal with the media leading into the fight and it was the reddest of red meat possible for the critics. I was flabbergasted that Dana managed to weave in Godfather Promoter Dana with Uncle Dana the therapist in one interview segment.

Voice #2 – Clay Travis

Nobody smells blood in the water faster than Clay Travis. The Nashville attorney who claims that he voted for Barack Obama twice but has no qualms going after “PC Bromanis” (Bomani Jones) who view themselves as social justice warriors and speech police.

Travis scorched Rousey after her UFC 207 loss as a fraud who was propped up by white liberal feminists and social justice warriors in sports media pushing women’s empowerment. He called Ronda Rousey the Bernie Madoff of female athletes. Three months earlier, Travis proclaimed Rousey to be the most powerful female athlete ever.

Clay’s ability to make your head explode is par excellence. The problem is that if you attack the hyperbolic part of his arguments, it forces you to confront the other issues where there’s grains of truth.

Ronda Rousey did not invent women’s MMA. Gina Carano and Cris Cyborg were tearing the house down long before she came on the scene. ESPN called her a trailblazer. She was (and is). But it was embarrassing to see ESPN try to make Ramona Shelburne into Ronda’s Ahmad Rashad. It was laughable to see Ring Magazine put Ronda Rousey on its cover and ask if Ronda would take over women’s boxing as well as women’s MMA.

Ronda Rousey was great for Ronda Rousey and great for UFC.

Voice #3 – Jason Whitlock

In a scorching hot take on Thursday, Jason Whitlock refined Clay Travis’s argument and made it significantly more expolosive. Whitlock buttressed Clay’s argument that white liberal feminists, social justice warriors, and the PC police were the ones building up the myth of Ronda Rousey by adding that this same crowd intentionally pushed Ronda Rousey at the expense of powerful black women athletes like Serena Williams. Whitlock noted that when Miss Williams had her Serena (Grand) Slam in tennis, it was Rousey who ESPN gushed over for awards and their body issue.

Where do you begin to attack or unpack this argument? You can’t attack hot takes with logic and facts. Logic and facts don’t persuade people. Emotion does. How you feel is what makes an impact. Scott Adams, the Godfather of 2016 American political analysis, wrote the book on this – How to Fail at Almost Everything and Still Win Big.

This is why you don’t give creative control over your sports product to television networks.

Topics: MMA, Media, UFC, Zach Arnold | 5 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

5 Responses to “Fox Sports goes all-in for the kill on Ronda Rousey’s UFC career”

  1. Diaz's packed bowl says:

    well, i had to find out what all the Rhondas white privilege hubub was about and clicked on the…

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZIsMYh–AE

    “she was a judo”

    “she’s gonna get you in her arm bar move and hold”

    “she finally got found out”

    Is this some kind of new mma language? I mean when the talking heads talk mma… are broken sentences and malapropisms the norm?

  2. 45 Huddle says:

    The UFC had an amazing 2016. It was a perfect storm of success for the UFC. UFC 200, UFC NYC, Connor/Diaz (2x), & Rousey’s return.

    And yet 2017 couldn’t look bleaker. Rousey is most likely gone or severely damaged as a draw. Connor is either taking a very long break or trying to avoid his top 2 challengers. The rest of the champions are either trying to get more money or trying to avoid the next logical contender.

    Not good times for the UFC.

    • 45 Huddle says:

      I should also add that the UFC only has 1 PPV for Jan/Feb, and it wouldn’t even be a great FOX card….

      • Diaz's packed bowl says:

        I talked with an old pal of mine, who is on record saying he doesn’t watch wmma, and he had all kinds of things to say about RR’s latest loss, he even watched the fight on youtube or somesuch. He’s talking about it because everyone else is(in the media).
        This guy who hates wmma was supporting RR saying she needs a boxing coach like Roach, etc… he actually tried to convince me she could be a good boxer in a year(when she already had a year). I said it doesnt matter when everyone else is 5-10 years ahead of you. I explained that she needs to grapple to win, since RR is still ahead of the game in the grappling dept.
        She needs to work exclusively with some world class wrestlers to learn how to change levels and shoot the takedown, since she has a hard time grabbing the head and shoulders while being punched in the face.

        Personally I dont like watching wmma strikers since the beaten woman look isn’t my thing.
        But watching two women grapple is very entertaining.
        #1 The girls go a lot harder with the grappling, they aren’t afraid to lose position to go for a submission.
        #2 Two girls rolling around togather is always fun to watch no matter the skill level, whether in the cage in the mud or just in the living room.
        #3 Fighting as self defense… something the ufc has forgotten long ago. Self defense courses designed to protect women can’t just teach striking for obvious reasons. But a woman who can take the fight to the ground can go to work. Having rolled with some very high level women black belts in judo(who I outweighed by 60lbs), they can leave you in a sweaty huffing pile in 5-10 minutes. But on the feet one strong jab is all it takes.

        So how irresponsible and dangerous is it for ufc and now the MSM to promote this fantasy that women can box/ or should box with men?

        • 45 Huddle says:

          I can count in 1 hand the number of UFC Women’s fights that I have watched that I thought looked like a quality contest between both participants.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image