Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Josh Gross


OC Register


Tatame


MMA Metrics


USA Today


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


Heavy MMA


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Lowkick


Liver Kick


Caged In


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


Fightlinker


Sportsnet


Joe Ferraro


Rating Fights


Infinite MMA


MMA Convert


Fightline


CompuBox


CompuStrike


MMA Frenzy


Ult MMA


Kevin Iole


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


MMA Tycoon - The MMA Management Game
Follow the latest replies in our comments section
By: TwitterButtons.com
By TwitterButtons.com Facebook Widgets
Powered By Vistaprint

Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


MMA Online


David Williams


Audio Corner


Tapout Radio


Sherdog Radio


Joe Ferraro


The Fightworks Podcast


Eddie Goldman


Pro MMA Radio


MMA Torch


Video Corner


Fight Hub


The Fight Nerd


ESPN MMA Live


Strikeforce


Japanese MMA


Nightmare of Battle


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

Site Meter

« | Home | »

Report: Forrest Griffin out of action for all of 2009

By Zach Arnold | January 13, 2009

So sayeth The Sun in the only style they can.

On a side note, the mess in Michigan for MMA legislation is growing.

Topics: MMA, Media, UFC, Zach Arnold | 11 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback | Share This

11 Responses to “Report: Forrest Griffin out of action for all of 2009”

  1. 45 Huddle says:

    That guarantees Evans/Griffin. I was hoping for Evans vs. Silva/Machida, with the winner fighting Rampage/Forrest 2.

  2. Kelvin says:

    They are saying that Dana wanted to put Forrest against Rampage this summer? SMH.

  3. Jeremy (not that Jeremy) says:

    How does that guarantee Evans/Griffin?

    They’re not going to ice their champion for a year just because the last one is out.

  4. Kelvin says:

    It’ll be Evans/Rampage with Machida possibly fighting the winner if he wins at UFC 94 IMO.

    http://mma4real.net/2009/01/13/why-forrest-griffin-injury-could-be-a-blessing-in-disguise-for-lyoto-machida/

  5. Fluyid says:

    “They are saying that Dana wanted to put Forrest against Rampage this summer?”

    That’s what UFC supremo Dana White had planned.

  6. 45 Huddle says:

    Oops, I meant it guarantees Evans/Rampage.

  7. Ivan Trembow says:

    As for who is getting the next title shot, the UFC had already made clear in numerous interviews (starting on the night of UFC 92) that the next title shot was going to Jackson, not to the Machida/Silva winner.

  8. klown says:

    With Griffin out of commission, W.Silva probably dropping to 180, and Jardine playing the role of gatekeeper to the Top 5 (set to face up-and-comer Cane), we are left with a list of exciting contenders.

    I’m still hoping against hope they’ll nix the idea of putting the Henderson-Franklin winner on TUF vs Bisping – especially if the winner is Franklin. This would clarify the LHW division rather than further confusing the MW picture.

    The winner of Henderson-Franklin could fight the winner of Machida-T.Siva for a title fight. Anyone who gets past 2 of those 4 fighters certainly deserves a shot. The potential match-ups against the winner of Evans-Rampage are tantalizing.

    Meanwhile, Liddell would face the winner of Rua-Coleman. If Rua were to beat Coleman and Liddell, he would deserve the next shot, and for that matter, if Coleman overcame Rua and Liddell, he’d have a strong case for a title shot himself.

    As for Liddell, one victory might not be enough. Perhaps he could take on the loser of Evans-Rampage, and only be allowed a title shot if he avenges one of those losses.

  9. Zack says:

    With fighter’s going on record saying that Forrest’s punches can’t bust a grape…maybe he’s getting steel inserted into his hand old school wrasslin style. He could’ve made it easier on himself and just stuck to coal miner’s glove matches though.

  10. Steven says:

    This story is false.

    Don’t report anything from the Sun. They made up the Couture vs. Liddell 4 news too.

  11. Ivan Trembow says:

    While The Sun has had plenty of false stories, the fact that Couture-Liddell 4 was a possibility was not one of their false stories. If they ever reported that it was signed or agreed to, that would have been false, but just the fact that it was a potential fight was not false. The fight was informally offered to both Couture and Liddell, and neither fighter was interested in it, with Couture wanting the loser of Nogueira-Mir (since Lesnar was guaranteed the winner of Nogueira-Mir), and with Liddell having a number of fights that interested him more than another Couture fight.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word