Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


MMA Dude Bro


Sherdog Radio


Eddie Goldman


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) statement regarding Lamont Peterson drug test disclosure

By Zach Arnold | May 10, 2012

Print Friendly and PDF

Statement from the Voluntary Anti-Doping Association:

VADA’s mission is to help protect the health and safety of athletes who are willing to demonstrate their commitment to clean sport. As a voluntary organization, we depend on those who share our vision to help rid boxing and MMA of PEDs. VADA understands and shares the disappointment that is felt by Golden Boy Promotions, Amir Khan, the undercard fighters, HBO, and the thousands of fans who were looking forward to Khan-Peterson II. This unfortunate situation, however, serves to underscore the need for PED education and the high-caliber testing procedures that VADA offers.

VADA has respect for Richard Schaefer, GBP, and their commitment to clean sport. However, VADA disagrees with Mr. Schaefer’s characterizations of the contractual relationship between GBP and VADA. The facts are as follows.

There was never a final or signed contract between GBP and VADA. When VADA became involved with the Peterson-Khan fight in March, the individual athletes signed up for the VADA program and executed the proper documentation.

VADA was told that GBP also wanted a contract so that GBP would be authorized to receive the testing results, including the preliminary results from an “A” sample analysis. It is important to understand that “A” sample results are only preliminary, do not legally stand up by themselves, and under commonly accepted anti-doping procedures are typically released only to the athlete.

In order for VADA to release the preliminary “A” sample results to a third party such as GBP, VADA requires an executed authorization allowing us to do so. VADA sent GBP a draft contract for its signature which would have authorized the preliminary “A” sample results to be released to GBP. This initial draft (which was never signed) contained a clause pursuant to which GBP would have represented that it had obtained the necessary authorization from the fighters. GBP’s legal team rejected this clause and instead suggested making the fighters signatories to the contract with their signatures being the necessary authorization. VADA’s counsel made it clear to GBP that, if GBP wanted to handle it this way, GBP must take responsibility for obtaining the athlete’s signatures. Unfortunately, and to VADA’s dismay, GBP never obtained the signatures.

Various versions of a draft contract were sent back and forth between GBP and VADA. The contract was never finalized. Richard Schaefer may, or may not, have been aware of this situation. The bottom line is that VADA had no contract with GBP. This is not a mere technicality. It involves issues of medical ethics. VADA needed a signed contract in order to deviate from its Results Management Policy (posted on our website) and release the preliminary and personal medical information to a third party. VADA still has never received a signed contract or signed athlete authorization from GBP.

VADA would have been happy to inform GBP of the preliminary “A” results. But we needed a signed authorization allowing us to do so, which we never received.

It has also been asked why it took so long to test the “B” sample after the first positive test result. When VADA notified Mr. Peterson of the adverse finding on April 13, Mr. Peterson had one week to challenge the “A” test result and ask for the “B” sample to be tested. During that time, Mr. Peterson also had the opportunity to supplement his earlier written submissions to VADA with regard to drugs and other medications that he had used prior to the testing. Mr. Peterson’s representatives waited eight days (until Saturday, April 21) to respond. At that time, they did not communicate any of the “exculpatory” material later offered to the Nevada State Athletic Commission. Instead, they chose to challenge the positive test result, asserted their right to be present when the “B” sample was tested, and asked that the “B” sample be tested on Friday, April 27th. The UCLA laboratory said that Friday was an inappropriate day to begin testing because four consecutive days are needed to complete the test. The sample “B” test began on Monday, April 30th.

VADA has complied in every way with all signed contracts that we had and will continue to do so. VADA welcomes the discussion about the dangers of PEDs to those who use them and to their opponents. We also reiterate our contention that it is imperative for the managers, promoters, and friends of these brave athletes to assist in the education about PEDs. VADA will help in every way we can. Our hope is that there will come a time when every test is negative.

Topics: Boxing, Media, Zach Arnold | 12 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

12 Responses to “Voluntary Anti-Doping Association (VADA) statement regarding Lamont Peterson drug test disclosure”

  1. Jonathan says:

    Remember when MMA sites used to cover fights?

    This doping/legislation stuff bores the hell out of me. What you need Zach is a forum where the people who come to this site for opinions can talk openly with the other people who come here to talk to one another and express thoughts in the comments section

    • edub says:

      That regularly happens in the comments section anyway.

      • Jonathan says:

        I know, but I would like a more structured place where we could more easily find and reply to one another.

    • Zach Arnold says:

      What happens outside the ring/cage impacts what happens in it.

      If you didn’t learn that lesson from the PRIDE scandal and all the manpower I spent covering that debacle, then I don’t know what else to tell you.

      Corruption in the sport in regards to crony commissioners, rampant doping, and utter incompetence does influence & impact what happens on your TV screen.

      • Jonathan says:

        I didn’t say it didn’t matter, just that it literally holds zero interest for me personally.

        Thoughts on the forum idea?

      • Alan Conceicao says:

        If there’s anything being a boxing fan since I was a tot has taught me, its that the corruption in the American fight system isn’t about to bring down anything. Its been perpetuated for almost a hundred years and has been dragged to the surface consistently by people with bigger voices and better writing with much more consistent and concrete material backing it. And you know what? It is still there.

        • Zach Arnold says:

          Name one item I stated here that is false.

        • Alan Conceicao says:

          Lots of it is text lifted from bills or press releases, which is nice and all, but the “analysis” of California politics makes it sound like the unions and politicians see MMA as being of primary interest. Its as if there are tons of guys in suits sitting in smoke filled backrooms determining in Illuminati-like fashion the future of MMA in California over a couple million dollars in a state that would a top 10 economy in the world if it were an independent nation.

  2. Weezy02 says:

    “VADA would have been happy to inform GBP of the preliminary “A” results. But we needed a signed authorization allowing us to do so, which we never received.”

    Two things I’m taking away from all this:

    1. VADA is correct that they didn’t have an obligation to provide any sort of results from the “A” sample.

    2. Going forward, ANY fight promoter that VADA deals with that is worth a dime will, without exception, demand such notification in writing.

    This is VADA’s first bout that they’ve tested for in 2012. What will be very interesting is to see how many bouts they test for this year. It’s an interesting test to see how sports react to second level testing.Currently all the major sports leagues don’t have any second level testing and the primary testing they have is often behind many Athletic Commissions. Maybe they can enlist VADA’s services too. Does anyone know if VADA is actively engaging the major sports leagues to to second level testing for them?

  3. […] Fight Opinion gives the full VADA response to the Lamont Peterson scandal. […]

  4. J-Rock says:

    It seems like this is the only real news source where you can get info on topics many (not all) are afraid to write about.

  5. Chris says:

    I don’t think a special forum is needed to discuss issues around doping. I visit FO daily, and there are plenty of articles and site links that hold zero interest for me. So I just choose to skip over them.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image