Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Eddie Goldman


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

What Is A Merger Agreement

By Zach Arnold | October 14, 2021

Print Friendly and PDF

The terms “spin-off”, “spin-off” and “spin-out” are sometimes used to refer to a situation where a company splits into two parts and produces a second company that may or may not be listed separately on the stock exchange. When two companies that produce parts or services for a product merge, the union is called a vertical merger. A vertical merger occurs when two companies operating at different levels of the supply chain in the same industry combine their activities. These mergers are carried out to increase the synergies achieved through the cost reduction resulting from the merger with one or more public services. One of the best-known examples of vertical mergers occurred in 2000, when Internet service provider America Online (AOL) partnered with media conglomerate Time Warner. After closing, adjustments can still be made to certain provisions of the purchase contract, including the purchase price. These adjustments are subject to applicability issues in certain situations. Alternatively, some transactions use the “locked box” approach, where the purchase price is determined upon signature and is based on the value of the seller`s equity at a pre-subscription date and interest charges. In the long run, due to the desire to reduce costs, it has been advantageous for companies to merge and reduce their transportation costs in order to produce and transport from a single location and not from different locations of different companies as in the past. Low transportation costs, coupled with economies of scale, also increased the size of the company by two to four times in the second half of the nineteenth century. In addition, technological changes prior to the merger movement within companies have increased the efficient size of facilities with capital-intensive assembly lines, resulting in economies of scale. Thus, the improvement of technology and transport were precursors of the Great Fusion Movement.

However, partly because of competitors, as mentioned above, and partly because of the government, many of these initially successful mergers were eventually dismantled. The U.S. government passed the Sherman Act in 1890, which established rules against price fixing and monopolies. Beginning in the 1890s, with cases such as Addyston Pipe and Steel Company v. In the United States, the courts have challenged large corporations that are pursuing strategies with others or within their own companies to maximize their profits. Pricing with competitors created a greater incentive for companies to merge and merge under a single name, so that they were no longer competitors and technically no longer pricing. “Acquisition” generally refers to the purchase of a small business by a larger one. Sometimes, however, a small company acquires management control of a larger and/or established company for a longer time and retains the latter`s name for the merged company after the acquisition.

.

Topics: Uncategorized | No Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

Comments are closed.