Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Eddie Goldman


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Remedy Agreement Definition

By Zach Arnold | December 15, 2020

Print Friendly and PDF

In total, as long as the serious financial agreement agreed is, from a forward-looking perspective, a reasonable forecast of the potential harm suffered by the seller, the agreement should be applied “without taking into account the retroactive calculation of the actual injury or the ease with which they can be proven.” The likely difficulty of estimating potential damage is a factor that must be used in assessing the adequacy of the serious money agreement… In accordance with the agreement, the total purchase price was due in cash on December 3, 1990 or before December 3, 1990…. The agreement required Watson to pay a US$15,000 deposit to La Treuhand with Kelstrup Realty, provided that “[i]n, in the event of a late payment of the purchaser, serious money is paid to the seller as liquidated damage, unless the seller chooses to claim actual damage or a particular benefit. Finally, the agreement contained a provision entitled “BUYER`S REPRESENTATIONS”, which states that “the purchaser indicates that the purchaser has sufficient resources to enter into this sale in accordance with this agreement and does not rely on a conditional source of funds unless otherwise stipulated in this agreement.” For example, Juan buys ten bags of concrete to make a counter and stand up for his expensive new barbecue. The bags have this formulation under great pressure: “Be careful. Our sole liability in the event that this product is defective will provide them with a similar amount of non-defective equipment. We are not responsible for any other direct or indirect, explicit or implied damage.┬áIt doesn`t matter. If the concrete is broken, if the concrete slab is broken and Juan`s new barbecue is damaged, he will have only a few new bags with good concrete. He could have shopped to find someone who would provide concrete without limitation of responsibility. His appeals are limited by the agreement he has reached. In common law and mixed civil courts, the right of appeal distinguishes between an appeal (for example. B a certain amount of damages) and a fair remedy (for example. B termination remedies or special benefits).

Another type of remedy available in these systems is the declaratory exemption where a court determines the parties` rights of appeal without awarding damages or ordering an appropriate damages order. The nature of the remedies to be applied in some cases depends on the nature of the unlawful action and its liability. [1] The special benefit is an injunction from the court to the authority that ordered it to take over the benefit to which it entered into a contract. The special benefit is an alternative compensation measure and may be taken at the discretion of the Tribunal, subject to a number of exceptions. Emily signs a contract to sell Charlotte a golden samowar, a Russian antique of great sentimental value, because it once belonged to Charlotte`s mother. Emily refuses the contract while she is still running. A court can grant Charlotte a performance against Emily. Once students understand the basic idea of specific performance, they often want to jump on it as a solution for almost every breach of contract. It seems reasonable that the non-oppressive party could ask a court to simply require the promised corporation to do what it promised. But specific performance is a very limited remedy: it is available only for breach of contract to sell a single item, i.e. a unique element of personal property (the Samovar), or real estate (all real estate is unique). But if the article is not unique, so that the non-correlating party go and buy another, then the money damages claim will solve the problem.

And some services will never be used to force a person to provide services against their will, which would be an involuntary servitude. A person may be forced to do what he or she should not do (omission), but not be forced to do what he or she will not do. Court orders compel the defendant to do something for the plaintiff or to refrain from doing so.

Topics: Uncategorized | No Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

Comments are closed.