Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Eddie Goldman


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Does The Uk Have A Double Taxation Agreement With Guernsey

By Zach Arnold | December 6, 2020

Print Friendly and PDF

Guernsey has signed tax information exchange agreements (TIEA) with 60 legal systems and comprehensive double taxation agreements (DBA) with Cyprus, Hong Kong, the Isle of Man, Jersey, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Mauritius, Monaco, Qatar, Seychelles, Singapore and the United Kingdom. Taxes paid in these jurisdictions that are not paid on dividends or debt securities are accepted as a credit against the income tax owed by Guernsey. On Monday, representatives of the government of Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man signed the new agreements that significantly enhance and modernize Crown Dependencies` DTAs with the United Kingdom. These DBAs are in line with the new international tax standards, which are broadly in line with the OECD Standard Tax Convention, and include various erosion and profit-shifting (BEPS) measures. The agreement that has just been reached is that, if the facts and circumstances have not changed, from where the company`s activities are managed and controlled, and where the residence was set in accordance with the 1952 UK DBA, the competent authorities will not attempt to reconsider this position simply following the modification of the UK DBA test in 2018. , unless the provisions were designed to deny benefits under section 23 (“benefit rights”) of the agreement. 2018 UK DTA. Section 21 (Various Rules for Certain Offshore Activities) provides that a stable establishment is considered to constitute when a resident engages in offshore activities related to the exploration or exploitation of the seabed or seabed or their natural resources in the other territory, when such activities continue for a period or periods that interact for more than 30 days over a 12-month period. To determine whether the 30-day period has been exceeded, the activities of an associated company that are essentially identical are taken into account, unless they are carried out simultaneously. The old contracts were among the oldest in the British network, the Anglo-Norman Islands agreements came into force for the first time in 1952, followed in 1955 by the Isle of Man. The new contracts have been updated and are largely in line with the 2017 OECD edition of the Income and Capital Model and Commentary Convention. When a person is denied a benefit under the contract, the competent authority of the territory that would otherwise have granted the benefit nevertheless considers it to be a different right to benefit or benefits with respect to a specified income item or capital gain, when that competent authority treats that authority at that person`s request and after considering the relevant facts and circumstances.

, notes that these benefits would have been granted to that person in the absence of the transaction or agreement mentioned above. While some contractual benefits will be available under the new DBA, Crown Dependencies will also help collect taxes for the UK Treasury. This was a contentious issue over the years, with the Crown Dependencies being some of the few jurisdictions not to include this clause in their DBA or other agreements with the United Kingdom. When a company is considered to be established in both zones, the competent authorities determine the place of residence of the company within the meaning of the treaty, by mutual agreement, taking into account its actual place of administration, where it is registered or for some other reason, and other relevant factors. In the absence of an agreement, the company is not considered a resident of either of the two territories to benefit from the treaty benefits, with the exception of the benefits provided in Articles 22 (elimination of double taxation), 24 (non-discrimination) and 25 (mutual agreement procedures).

Topics: Uncategorized | No Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

Comments are closed.