Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Josh Gross


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Lowkick


Liver Kick


Fightsport Asia


Caged In


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


Bloody Elbow


Fightlinker


Fightnomics


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


MMA Convert


Fightline


Fight Medicine


CompuStrike


MMA Frenzy


Fighters


Kevin Iole


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


MMA Dude Bro


Sherdog Radio


The Fightworks Podcast


Eddie Goldman


Pro MMA Radio


MMA Torch


Video Corner


Fight Hub


The Fight Nerd


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

Site Meter

« | Home | »

Two Nevada commission governing changes just made Vegas more hostile to fighters

By Zach Arnold | May 25, 2016

Print Friendly and PDF

In America, there are three major bodies of law: criminal, civil, and administrative. Commissions like the Nevada State Athletic Commission are administrative but often get carried away in regards to what the scope of their authority is.

Last month, we detailed major changes coming to Nevada’s commission in regards to both their financial & legal obligations. Nevada’s state budget is transitioning the commission from general funding to self-funding, meaning there is no longer a blank check for funding expenditures. The Athletic Commission got hit with a fat legal bill for years of work the Attorney General’s office did for them in the past.

As a result of the funding mechanism being changed, the Athletic Commission is backed against the wall. With out-of-competition drug testing, disciplinary hearings, administrative costs of handling paperwork & medical records, and all the drama surrounding combat sports, a lot of resources are required. Nevada’s commission has always prided itself on having a lean, efficient, prompt operation.

Now the money’s drying up and without Floyd Mayweather fights on the horizon, a change in philosophy is occurring in Las Vegas. For fighters and their due process rights, it may not be for the better.

At Wednesday’s meeting in Las Vegas, the Athletic Commission discussed pending changes for punishment of licensees after June 21st. There are three big philosophical & governing changes:

Nevada’s commission had a choice after they were removed from general funding: 1) be more selective in punishing fighters and picking their battles, or 2) throw the book at everyone by overcharging & criminalizing to force settlement agreements.

The commissioners, at Wednesday’s meeting, openly discussed how jacking up punishments for suspensions would … encourage … licensees into negotiating settlement agreements with the Attorney General’s office. One of the major goals behind this push, according to the commissioners, is to push for settlement agreements in order to prevent the Athletic Commission from paying thousands of dollars in legal bills to the AG’s office for investigating & compiling evidence for presentation at an appeals hearing. It is not unreasonable for the average person to come to the conclusion that the principle of a trial tax is at stake here.

It does not end there. An important part of future settlement agreements involves the language used in the documents. We saw this new policy at work at Wednesday’s meeting for the disciplinary phase of MMA fighter Andrea Lee-Aaron. She was suspended for a positive drug test involving diuretics. Andrea’s attorney and the AG’s office reached a settlement agreement but had a dispute over legal language. According to the fighter’s attorney, the AG’s office and the commission wanted language stating that his client was guilty rather than liable or at fault.

The Athletic Commission is not a criminal or civil court. The fighter’s attorney had every right to raise the issue of an administrative body calling his client “guilty” and worrying about what future employers doing a background check would think of such an official document leveling that language.

A motion was passed to approve the settlement agreement contingent on both the fighter’s attorney and the AG’s office finalizing appropriate legal language. This was not the first time at Wednesday’s meeting that deputy AG Caroline Bateman was accused of over-stepping her bounds. Nevada commissioner Pat Lundvall raked Bateman over the coals in overcharging promoter Roy Englebrecht for forgery and ID theft when there was not enough evidence to prove specific intent in a clear & convincing manner. The irony is thick: the same body that accused Bateman of overcharging is now going to use the same strategy after June 21st in order to save money while keeping their tough-guy status in tact and the Athletic Commission will have no better ally in enforcing this strategy than Caroline Bateman.

Topics: Boxing, MMA, Media, Zach Arnold | 2 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

2 Responses to “Two Nevada commission governing changes just made Vegas more hostile to fighters”

  1. They should do as CSAC. Steal from neurological fund and pension fund to stay afloat.

    http://www.csaclmao.com

  2. [...] behavior from the Athletic Commission. During the Spring, members of the Athletic Commission openly stated in public comment that in order to avoid paying legal fees to the AG’s office that they would start pushing [...]

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image