Friend of our site

MMA Headlines


Josh Gross

MMA Fighting

MMA Torch

MMA Weekly

Sherdog (News)

Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick

Fightsport Asia

Caged In

MMA Junkie

MMA Mania

Bloody Elbow



MMA Ratings

Rating Fights

MMA Convert


Fight Medicine


MMA Frenzy


Kevin Iole

Yahoo MMA Blog

MMA Betting

Search this site

Latest Articles

News Corner

MMA Rising

Audio Corner


MMA Dude Bro

Sherdog Radio

The Fightworks Podcast

Eddie Goldman

Pro MMA Radio

MMA Torch

Video Corner

Fight Hub

The Fight Nerd

Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index

To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site

Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback

Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

Site Meter

« | Home | »

Friday news dump: Sacramento tells commission to not give fighters testosterone exemptions

By Zach Arnold | February 13, 2015

Print Friendly and PDF

There are two intriguing & news-worthy developments happening right now with the California State Athletic Commission and the political bosses that oversee the operation at the Department of Consumer Affairs in Sacramento.

One development is very much welcomed and the other development is very much crap. We’ll address the latter in another article soon forthcoming.

Onto the positive news. Awet Kidane, the big kahuna that oversees the 4,300+ workers at DCA in Sacramento, is now the second DCA boss in a row to tell the Athletic Commission to back off of Dr. VanBuren Ross Lemons’ dream of a Therapeutic Use Exemption policy. Dr. Lemons has repeatedly sold his policy idea as one which would make the process of granting TUEs for fighters needing testosterone as rare and supervised. The counter-argument, which the doctor and others have not been able to generate a response to, is this:

Why should there be a policy to allow any fighter to use testosterone when its a banned substance in the first place?

In April of 2012, we spoke out against the proposed TUE policy. In late 2014, a new push was quietly made to grease the skids to get the TUE proposal passed with a largely hidden 45-day comment period. That period ended on December 15th, 2014. On December 15th, DCA’s number one sent the Athletic Commission a letter stating his formal opposition to implementing any such TUE policy.

Here is the text from that letter, which was released late Friday afternoon:

Dear Chairman Frierson:

[DCA] has great concerns regarding the California State Athletic Commission’s proposed regulations for the establishment of a Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) process. I would like to commend the Commission’s thoughtful efforts to craft a fully realized regulatory process. However, serious procedural and policy concerns remain and I urge the Commission to withdraw this proposal and cease moving forward with the establishment of TUEs in California.

Despite the Commission’s best efforts, the proposed regulation still lacks completeness in both transparency and specificity. For example, the regulation is silent on the physical review of the TUE application, a process that must be as transparent as can be made possible. As written, members of the public and licensees are not provided clarity as to whether the application is reviewed by the Medical Advisory Committee, the full Commission, the Executive Officer, or some combination thereof. The proposal also does not specify if the application, and the review of it, would be made public or kept confidential. Additionally, there is language that indicates retroactive exemptions could be made possible, and this is simply unacceptable given the gravity and history of this subject.

More importantly, the need for this regulation proposal has yet to be justified. This is particularly true provided that existing law already grants the strongest protection for our licensees by prohibiting the use of forbidden substances banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency. This regulation exposes licensees of the Commission to unnecessary risk that goes above and beyond those inherent in their chosen profession. The risk that is taken by allowing licensees of the Commission to use, among other substances, synthetic testosterone, is extraordinary. This raises numerous concerns, not the least of which is that the opponent of any fighter with an exemption for the steroid could be at a dangerous disadvantage to someone who has been training, and is performing, with the help of that substance.

Fighter safety would be jeopardized in more ways than it would be protected, which is why states like Nevada have placed outright bans on TUE’s, and the Association of Ringside Physicians, “supports the general elimination of [TUEs] for [TRT].” By following Nevada’s example of not allowing any exemptions, and preserving the restrictions in existing law, the Commission will send the strongest message possible which is that our athletes will continue to compete on an even playing field and in a manner that will not jeopardize their health and safety. Ultimately, this demonstrates the Commission’s commitment to upholding its mission statement by ensuring the health, safety and welfare of the participants in regulated competitive sporting events in California.

For this reasons I reiterate my encouragement that the Commission not move forward with the adoption of proposed section 424. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on your proposed rulemaking. If you have any questions, please contact Christine Lally, Deputy Director for Board and Bureau Relations at 916-574-8200.


Awet Kidane, Director
Department of Consumer Affairs

Reginald Fair, Deputy Secretary, Legislation, Business Consumer Services and Housing Agency
Christine Lally, Deputy Director for Board and Bureau Relations
Melinda McClain, Deputy Director for Division of Legislative and Policy Review
Andy Foster, Executive Officer, California State Athletic Commission

If Dr. Lemons wants to save his TUE proposal, he will have to whip the other votes and I’m very skeptical that he will be able to do so at this point in time.

Topics: Boxing, CSAC, MMA, Media, Zach Arnold | 1 Comment » | Permalink | Trackback |

One Response to “Friday news dump: Sacramento tells commission to not give fighters testosterone exemptions”

  1. Adwet Kidane doesn’t want Pro MMA fighters to use steroids. But all day long DCA’s appointed CAMO fighters can. No drug test to Amateur MMA fighters, No Brain Scans, No Medicals. They strike the head just as hard as the Pro MMA fighters but more times a month. They make the same amount of money or probably more. They get paid by ticket sales. Pro MMA fighters can’t even fight on a pro card unless they sell the required amount of tickets.Why go pro if you can make more fighting amateur and not pay for huge medicals. It is time for the Federal Government to step in and protect all fighters equally. The CSAC wont enforce the Ali act because the UFC wont hold there events here. A law is a law for the protection and welfare of all fighters.

    The Man, The Myth, The self proclaimed Legend Mario Delgado returns to the cage Feb 20th !! As we all know these fighters need to sell a minimum amount of tickets to be on the card. Let me know if you can come out and support some young talent !!!! Ill Have tickets at the gym all week !!! Tickets are $50 each. Hit me up for group discounts…. Tracy Hess’ Subfighter MMA
    Tracy Hess – Timeline Photos | Facebook


    Tracy Hess – Timeline Photos | Facebook
    The Man, The Myth, The self proclaimed Legend Mario Delgado returns to the cage Feb 20th !! As we all know these fighters need to sell a minimum amount…
    View on
    Preview by Yahoo

    In California because of no clue Andy Foster you can’t even tell if the fight is Amateur or Pro. Amateur MMA fighters wear no head gear, no brain scan, no proper medicals, no rash guards to distinguish pro from amateur. It is dangerous and a joke in California because of our termed out corrupt commission.


To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image