Friend of our site


MMA Headlines


UFC HP


Bleacher Report


MMA Fighting


MMA Torch


MMA Weekly


Sherdog (News)


Sherdog (Articles)


Liver Kick


MMA Junkie


MMA Mania


MMA Ratings


Rating Fights


Yahoo MMA Blog


MMA Betting


Search this site



Latest Articles


News Corner


MMA Rising


Audio Corner


Oddscast


Sherdog Radio


Video Corner


Fight Hub


Special thanks to...

Link Rolodex

Site Index


To access our list of posting topics and archives, click here.

Friend of our site


Buy and sell MMA photos at MMA Prints

Site feedback


Fox Sports: "Zach Arnold's Fight Opinion site is one of the best spots on the Web for thought-provoking MMA pieces."

« | Home | »

Scott Coker says he’ll continue to work with DREAM despite their money troubles

By Zach Arnold | October 11, 2010

Print Friendly and PDF

Danny Acosta did a good job with this interview. Watch it for the full context, but some bullet points:

Topics: DREAM, Media, MMA, StrikeForce, Zach Arnold | 13 Comments » | Permalink | Trackback |

13 Responses to “Scott Coker says he’ll continue to work with DREAM despite their money troubles”

  1. Fred says:

    I don’t know the particulars of the DREAM agreement, but as has been noted by Zach, Strikeforce has done a mostly terrible job of promoting the concept of USA vs. Japan and of promoting the individual DREAM fighters as exotic talent. If they couldn’t show us what a dangerous and unique fighter Shinya Aoki was, if they couldn’t burn the image in fan’s minds of him breaking Hirota’s arm and flipping off the crowd, then how are they going to do anything with Kawajiri?

    Anybody know if Strikeforce gets any traction in the Japanese market with these fights?

    Ed. — Very little traction.

  2. fd says:

    “Diaz fights at 155 and 170”

    Diaz has never fought at 155. His “lightweight” fights in EliteXC were all at 160, and the last time he actually fought at that weight was two years ago. In the intervening time he’s fought at 180 almost as often as 170.

  3. mr. roadblock says:

    Coker continually shows what an internet mark he is.

    Who exactly is clamoring to see Kawajiri vs Thompson? And why?

    The only thing he says that makes sense is that he’s thinking of getting rid of that tramp-stamp looking logo.

    I can’t stand Mayhem and wish he’d just go away. But him vs Diaz is possibly the only marketable fight these guys can make. Why isn’t that the #1 priority? Is marking out of Kawajiri and JZ Calvan (another internet mark favorite) a higher priority?

    • I’m not clamoring for Kawajiri/Thompson, but if he is willing to run it, I’ll watch. I’m not here to pretend that I’m smarter than anyone by saying “I don’t want to see that good competitive fight that’s not on PPV – it won’t draw!”.

      • mr. roadblock says:

        I’d rather see some exciting guys that are up and comers is my point.

        Coker’s acting like this is the stuff fans want to see. That’s how he ends up with these disjointed shows that have one good fight each if you’re lucky.

        • They don’t have those guys, so a couple guys I kinda care about fighting for free? OK. Same thing with UFC 120. Condit/Daley doesn’t mean anything really and both guys hit their ceilings. I’ll still watch it because it doesn’t cost me shit.

  4. 45 Huddle says:

    Nick Diaz wasn’t paid for months for one of his DREAM fights. So yes, technically he was finally paid…. but one of “his fighters” had a problem with DREAM and the fact that he basically just avoids the question is extremely telling of his care for fighters.

    No honest promoter would work with an organization who does what DREAM does. Not paying fighters is one of the worst things a promoter can do. There should be a zero tolerance policy for it.

    • mr. roadblock says:

      Agreed. Guys need to be paid that night with no BS.

    • david m says:

      What a bleeding heart you have. I’m sure you felt similarly angry towards the UFC when Dana cut Lindland to avoid paying him 6 figures/fight just for wearing a hat.

      • edub says:

        Come on man, that’s such a BS run around argument. They didn’t stiff him for any fights. They cut him because he was demanding a title shot, and they didn’t want to risk him as their champion because Lindland was one of the most boring guys in the world from like 02-05 when he started to finish a few people.

      • The Gaijin says:

        Still there’s a world of difference between cutting a fighter to avoid paying a salary and having them fight for you and THEN not paying them. Like, a HUGE difference.

    • Fred says:

      this is true, but the co-promotion deal is a pretty good thing for the dream fighters that come here to fight. not only do they get exposure in america but they get paid. it’s not like strikeforce is really sending anybody over there anyway, unless you count diaz and moussasi. i’ll be curious to see if melendez actually ends up on the new year’s show.

  5. Bryan says:

    No one should really be surprised about DREAM doing this, fighters have been saying promoters in Japan have been doing this to them for years. Guy Mezger talks about it lot.

Comments

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-spam image