<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The limitations of the CBS/Showtime model for Strikeforce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70471</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70471</guid>
		<description>&quot;And I wouldn’t call the buyrates “crazy”. I can’t find the Observer issue that listed what some of the pre-cable ban shows got, but none of them reached near 500,000 or anything. I don’t even think they reached 300,000. Which was quite good for having no television and having most of your advertising being negative news pieces, but even if all of the fans from back then are still watching today (and they’re not, even though a million people claim they ordered UFC 1 when it got 75,000 buys) they’re a tiny minority.&quot;

I think the thing that people often misconstrue (not you but those people who think that UFC did mega-buys back in the early days) is that while they were wildly successful ppv&#039;s at the time, they didn&#039;t do these enormous real number buys.  The ppv universe was monumentally smaller in the early 90&#039;s than what it is today.  So while the ppv buys at the time were very &quot;big&quot;, they aren&#039;t big in terms of actual raw numbers (like say compared to UFC 92 or 100&#039;s numbers).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And I wouldn’t call the buyrates “crazy”. I can’t find the Observer issue that listed what some of the pre-cable ban shows got, but none of them reached near 500,000 or anything. I don’t even think they reached 300,000. Which was quite good for having no television and having most of your advertising being negative news pieces, but even if all of the fans from back then are still watching today (and they’re not, even though a million people claim they ordered UFC 1 when it got 75,000 buys) they’re a tiny minority.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think the thing that people often misconstrue (not you but those people who think that UFC did mega-buys back in the early days) is that while they were wildly successful ppv&#8217;s at the time, they didn&#8217;t do these enormous real number buys.  The ppv universe was monumentally smaller in the early 90&#8217;s than what it is today.  So while the ppv buys at the time were very &#8220;big&#8221;, they aren&#8217;t big in terms of actual raw numbers (like say compared to UFC 92 or 100&#8217;s numbers).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ivan Trembow</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70280</link>
		<dc:creator>Ivan Trembow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70280</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an article from my blog with minute-by-minute ratings for the Strikeforce broadcast on CBS: http://www.ivansblog.com/2009/11/minute-by-minute-ratings-for.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an article from my blog with minute-by-minute ratings for the Strikeforce broadcast on CBS: <a href="http://www.ivansblog.com/2009/11/minute-by-minute-ratings-for.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ivansblog.com/2009/11/minute-by-minute-ratings-for.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70278</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70278</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ken Shamrock and Royce Gracie’s financially successful fights during this current era show that there’s a high level of recognition for those guys. Its not like the UFC was watched by no one early on. Back then it got crazy buyrates.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It was the marketing, not just the name recognition. UFC had an agenda to get false hopes up for Royce against Hughes, as that fight was clearly a &quot;Zuffa &gt; SEG&quot; moment, which was safe to do because absolutely no one honestly believed Royce could survive Hughes&#039; power. Shit on the king of the early UFC&#039;s legacy and people stop talking about those days. And TUF 3 was what legitimized Ken Shamrock. If all they had to show were clips of Ortiz beating the shit out of him from UFC 40 the show never would have reached the height it did. And I&#039;d argue far more of his fanbase came from the WWF than stuck with him from UFC&#039;s 1-9. Unless they plan on having Renzo coach against Hughes on a TUF season (that&#039;s an awesome idea actually) there is no comparison. Otherwise they&#039;ve got nothing but Sakuraba snapping Renzo&#039;s arm and various Japanese fighters laying on top of him for a half hour in the PRIDE vault.

And I wouldn&#039;t call the buyrates &quot;crazy&quot;. I can&#039;t find the Observer issue that listed what some of the pre-cable ban shows got, but none of them reached near 500,000 or anything. I don&#039;t even think they reached 300,000. Which was quite good for having no television and having most of your advertising being negative news pieces, but even if all of the fans from back then are still watching today (and they&#039;re not, even though a million people claim they ordered UFC 1 when it got 75,000 buys) they&#039;re a tiny minority.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Renzo is a safe bet because of his family name, and because Matt Hughes can beat him. Koscheck, Johnson, etc. have never sold PPVs either, and unlike Renzo, Matt Hughes cannot beat them. They represent financial suicide for him.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

We&#039;re never going to agree on whether Gracie means much so continuing that argument is pointless. But Josh Koscheck is a far bigger name than Renzo Gracie is in America. Everybody from the first TUF season is. I mean just think about the sales pitch of Renzo &quot;Hey, Matt, you beat the son of my grand uncle 4 years ago so I&#039;m coming out of retirement to beat you even though I&#039;ve had years of sitting around doing nothing, now is the time!&quot;  You really think people care about that? Brother, maybe. 2nd cousin? No. Is Royce&#039;s neighbor next?

&lt;blockquote&gt;You’re wrong and right. He will fight past their prime names. He will also fight championship level guys he doesn’t belong in the ring with because he can bring buys. He will not fight prospects with no name for awhile.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Okay, so he&#039;ll fight championship level guys but you think Koscheck, Fitch and Johnson are no names? Then who is left in the division? A 4th GSP fight?  Getting destroyed worse than any WW would destroy him by Anderson Silva? (which should be saved for his last fight if they&#039;re doing it.) He says he&#039;s probably not going to actually finish his contract, so that&#039;s 3 or 4 fights. 1 is Renzo, the next 2 or 3 have to count. It can&#039;t be a 3rd Trigg fight.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Who do you think Liddell is likely to fight in a comeback: Houston Alexander &amp; Mark Coleman, or Lil’ Nog &amp; Jon Jones?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t think he&#039;s coming back unless they&#039;re really desperate for a title challenger and even then it&#039;s iffy. But regardless, Liddell has made his stars. He legitimized Shogun into a title contender, he single handedly made Rashad Evans a superstar (or actually Rashad&#039;s hand single handledly did...) and although Keith Jardine couldn&#039;t sell a PPV if he offered to split the cost with you, he made him as credible as possible. So if he fights Coleman in the last fight on his contract, it really doesn&#039;t matter. Hughes made GSP a star while he was still a serious contender but he still hasn&#039;t done what Liddell (and Randy) did in the (temporary) end of their careers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ken Shamrock and Royce Gracie’s financially successful fights during this current era show that there’s a high level of recognition for those guys. Its not like the UFC was watched by no one early on. Back then it got crazy buyrates.</p></blockquote>
<p>It was the marketing, not just the name recognition. UFC had an agenda to get false hopes up for Royce against Hughes, as that fight was clearly a &#8220;Zuffa &gt; SEG&#8221; moment, which was safe to do because absolutely no one honestly believed Royce could survive Hughes&#8217; power. Shit on the king of the early UFC&#8217;s legacy and people stop talking about those days. And TUF 3 was what legitimized Ken Shamrock. If all they had to show were clips of Ortiz beating the shit out of him from UFC 40 the show never would have reached the height it did. And I&#8217;d argue far more of his fanbase came from the WWF than stuck with him from UFC&#8217;s 1-9. Unless they plan on having Renzo coach against Hughes on a TUF season (that&#8217;s an awesome idea actually) there is no comparison. Otherwise they&#8217;ve got nothing but Sakuraba snapping Renzo&#8217;s arm and various Japanese fighters laying on top of him for a half hour in the PRIDE vault.</p>
<p>And I wouldn&#8217;t call the buyrates &#8220;crazy&#8221;. I can&#8217;t find the Observer issue that listed what some of the pre-cable ban shows got, but none of them reached near 500,000 or anything. I don&#8217;t even think they reached 300,000. Which was quite good for having no television and having most of your advertising being negative news pieces, but even if all of the fans from back then are still watching today (and they&#8217;re not, even though a million people claim they ordered UFC 1 when it got 75,000 buys) they&#8217;re a tiny minority.</p>
<blockquote><p>Renzo is a safe bet because of his family name, and because Matt Hughes can beat him. Koscheck, Johnson, etc. have never sold PPVs either, and unlike Renzo, Matt Hughes cannot beat them. They represent financial suicide for him.</p></blockquote>
<p>We&#8217;re never going to agree on whether Gracie means much so continuing that argument is pointless. But Josh Koscheck is a far bigger name than Renzo Gracie is in America. Everybody from the first TUF season is. I mean just think about the sales pitch of Renzo &#8220;Hey, Matt, you beat the son of my grand uncle 4 years ago so I&#8217;m coming out of retirement to beat you even though I&#8217;ve had years of sitting around doing nothing, now is the time!&#8221;  You really think people care about that? Brother, maybe. 2nd cousin? No. Is Royce&#8217;s neighbor next?</p>
<blockquote><p>You’re wrong and right. He will fight past their prime names. He will also fight championship level guys he doesn’t belong in the ring with because he can bring buys. He will not fight prospects with no name for awhile.</p></blockquote>
<p>Okay, so he&#8217;ll fight championship level guys but you think Koscheck, Fitch and Johnson are no names? Then who is left in the division? A 4th GSP fight?  Getting destroyed worse than any WW would destroy him by Anderson Silva? (which should be saved for his last fight if they&#8217;re doing it.) He says he&#8217;s probably not going to actually finish his contract, so that&#8217;s 3 or 4 fights. 1 is Renzo, the next 2 or 3 have to count. It can&#8217;t be a 3rd Trigg fight.</p>
<blockquote><p>Who do you think Liddell is likely to fight in a comeback: Houston Alexander &amp; Mark Coleman, or Lil’ Nog &amp; Jon Jones?</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t think he&#8217;s coming back unless they&#8217;re really desperate for a title challenger and even then it&#8217;s iffy. But regardless, Liddell has made his stars. He legitimized Shogun into a title contender, he single handedly made Rashad Evans a superstar (or actually Rashad&#8217;s hand single handledly did&#8230;) and although Keith Jardine couldn&#8217;t sell a PPV if he offered to split the cost with you, he made him as credible as possible. So if he fights Coleman in the last fight on his contract, it really doesn&#8217;t matter. Hughes made GSP a star while he was still a serious contender but he still hasn&#8217;t done what Liddell (and Randy) did in the (temporary) end of their careers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Conceicao</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70275</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Conceicao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70275</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You could point to the low ratings IFL got and say the fanboyism they got online was inflated, or what the crappy main events of 2006 drew versus the online hate of them is no contest. &lt;/i&gt;

There was fanboyism for the IFL? 

&lt;i&gt;Show me proof the fans who cut their MMA teeth on The Ultimate Fighter care about 90s MMA if I’m wrong.&lt;/i&gt;

Ken Shamrock and Royce Gracie&#039;s financially successful fights during this current era show that there&#039;s a high level of recognition for those guys. Its not like the UFC was watched by no one early on. Back then it got crazy buyrates.

&lt;i&gt;I said people compared him and fighters with his limited skill level to guys like Tank Abbott, Kimo and Scott Ferrazo. &lt;/i&gt;

Which is deserved, because that&#039;s the level of fighter he is. And because he&#039;s a crappy fighter, he will lose to even mediocre fighters, and get bounced from the UFC once his ability to make money disappears along with his image. These are not ideas that are independent of one another. Rather, they&#039;re irrevocably entertwined.

&lt;i&gt;1) If it’s about PPV bonuses, Renzo is not the guy to get you that as your fellow headliner.&lt;/i&gt;

Renzo is a safe bet because of his family name, and because Matt Hughes can beat him. Koscheck, Johnson, etc. have never sold PPVs either, and unlike Renzo, Matt Hughes cannot beat them. They represent financial suicide for him. 

&lt;i&gt;They are not going to let him fight out his contract against less-than-stellar opponents.&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re wrong and right. He will fight past their prime names. He will also fight championship level guys he doesn&#039;t belong in the ring with because he can bring buys. He will not fight prospects with no name for awhile.

&lt;i&gt;They’d give Liddell that “retirement tour” treatment if they allowed it. &lt;/i&gt;

Who do you think Liddell is likely to fight in a comeback: Houston Alexander &amp; Mark Coleman, or Lil&#039; Nog &amp; Jon Jones?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You could point to the low ratings IFL got and say the fanboyism they got online was inflated, or what the crappy main events of 2006 drew versus the online hate of them is no contest. </i></p>
<p>There was fanboyism for the IFL? </p>
<p><i>Show me proof the fans who cut their MMA teeth on The Ultimate Fighter care about 90s MMA if I’m wrong.</i></p>
<p>Ken Shamrock and Royce Gracie&#8217;s financially successful fights during this current era show that there&#8217;s a high level of recognition for those guys. Its not like the UFC was watched by no one early on. Back then it got crazy buyrates.</p>
<p><i>I said people compared him and fighters with his limited skill level to guys like Tank Abbott, Kimo and Scott Ferrazo. </i></p>
<p>Which is deserved, because that&#8217;s the level of fighter he is. And because he&#8217;s a crappy fighter, he will lose to even mediocre fighters, and get bounced from the UFC once his ability to make money disappears along with his image. These are not ideas that are independent of one another. Rather, they&#8217;re irrevocably entertwined.</p>
<p><i>1) If it’s about PPV bonuses, Renzo is not the guy to get you that as your fellow headliner.</i></p>
<p>Renzo is a safe bet because of his family name, and because Matt Hughes can beat him. Koscheck, Johnson, etc. have never sold PPVs either, and unlike Renzo, Matt Hughes cannot beat them. They represent financial suicide for him. </p>
<p><i>They are not going to let him fight out his contract against less-than-stellar opponents.</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re wrong and right. He will fight past their prime names. He will also fight championship level guys he doesn&#8217;t belong in the ring with because he can bring buys. He will not fight prospects with no name for awhile.</p>
<p><i>They’d give Liddell that “retirement tour” treatment if they allowed it. </i></p>
<p>Who do you think Liddell is likely to fight in a comeback: Houston Alexander &amp; Mark Coleman, or Lil&#8217; Nog &amp; Jon Jones?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70271</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70271</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If message boards were relevant, than no one would have bought Shamrock/Tito II or III, or watched Kimbo ever, etc etc etc.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

You&#039;re right, in a lot of cases in the insular MMA world bubble a lot of beliefs carry more weight than they should. But this one is beyond that because there is evidence it is widespread. You could point to the low ratings IFL got and say the fanboyism they got online was inflated, or what the crappy main events of 2006 drew versus the online hate of them is no contest. But if UFC&#039;s fans honestly cared about the old days Unleashed would have huge ratings, they&#039;d put their entire library out on DVD now that the disputes of Lionsgate&#039;s SEG footage and the bad distribution deal the Zuffa stuff was released under are both resolved, and &quot;the old days&quot; wouldn&#039;t be a term for a fighter sucking. Show me proof the fans who cut their MMA teeth on The Ultimate Fighter care about 90s MMA if I&#039;m wrong.

&lt;blockquote&gt;How does that disprove the belief that he probably isn’t better than fighters from the earliest years of the sport? You’re all over the place.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I said people compared him and fighters with his limited skill level to guys like Tank Abbott, Kimo and Scott Ferrazo. There is a widespread belief that the fighters in UFC&#039;s 1-9 were littered with wild brawlers who would get murdered by well-rounded fighters of today. And in a lot of fans views, Royce&#039;s record was inflated by going up against a bunch of guys like that.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Because Matt Hughes won’t fight them for the money that they’re offering. How difficult is that for you to understand? Unless the UFC is going to pay him a significantly (and 25% or so based on *potential* PPV bonuses isn’t enough) higher amount of money to fight Josh Koscheck than Renzo Gracie, it is foolish of Matt to take the fight. Period. Point blank. Matt knows it, Joe Silva knows it, Matt’s manager knows it.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

1) If it&#039;s about PPV bonuses, Renzo is not the guy to get you that as your fellow headliner.

2) They are not going to let him fight out his contract against less-than-stellar opponents. They&#039;d give Liddell that &quot;retirement tour&quot; treatment if they allowed it. So after this is he going to say &quot;Get me Carlos Newton again or I&#039;m not fighting!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If message boards were relevant, than no one would have bought Shamrock/Tito II or III, or watched Kimbo ever, etc etc etc.</p></blockquote>
<p>You&#8217;re right, in a lot of cases in the insular MMA world bubble a lot of beliefs carry more weight than they should. But this one is beyond that because there is evidence it is widespread. You could point to the low ratings IFL got and say the fanboyism they got online was inflated, or what the crappy main events of 2006 drew versus the online hate of them is no contest. But if UFC&#8217;s fans honestly cared about the old days Unleashed would have huge ratings, they&#8217;d put their entire library out on DVD now that the disputes of Lionsgate&#8217;s SEG footage and the bad distribution deal the Zuffa stuff was released under are both resolved, and &#8220;the old days&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t be a term for a fighter sucking. Show me proof the fans who cut their MMA teeth on The Ultimate Fighter care about 90s MMA if I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<blockquote><p>How does that disprove the belief that he probably isn’t better than fighters from the earliest years of the sport? You’re all over the place.</p></blockquote>
<p>I said people compared him and fighters with his limited skill level to guys like Tank Abbott, Kimo and Scott Ferrazo. There is a widespread belief that the fighters in UFC&#8217;s 1-9 were littered with wild brawlers who would get murdered by well-rounded fighters of today. And in a lot of fans views, Royce&#8217;s record was inflated by going up against a bunch of guys like that.</p>
<blockquote><p>Because Matt Hughes won’t fight them for the money that they’re offering. How difficult is that for you to understand? Unless the UFC is going to pay him a significantly (and 25% or so based on *potential* PPV bonuses isn’t enough) higher amount of money to fight Josh Koscheck than Renzo Gracie, it is foolish of Matt to take the fight. Period. Point blank. Matt knows it, Joe Silva knows it, Matt’s manager knows it.</p></blockquote>
<p>1) If it&#8217;s about PPV bonuses, Renzo is not the guy to get you that as your fellow headliner.</p>
<p>2) They are not going to let him fight out his contract against less-than-stellar opponents. They&#8217;d give Liddell that &#8220;retirement tour&#8221; treatment if they allowed it. So after this is he going to say &#8220;Get me Carlos Newton again or I&#8217;m not fighting!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-4/#comment-70266</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70266</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course you like it, the UFC is doing it and they’re always correct and never wrong. But you didn’t have much respect for Shamrock-Gracie because Elite did it.&quot;

EliteXC was pushing Frank Shamrock is one of the best MMA fighters at the time.  Which was so far from reality.  It is the same reason I said Matt Hughes shouldn&#039;t be getting a title shot after he beats Renzo.

These fights aren&#039;t bad in themselves.  It is when they promote them as meaning something beyond that (which EliteXC did), that it is bad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course you like it, the UFC is doing it and they’re always correct and never wrong. But you didn’t have much respect for Shamrock-Gracie because Elite did it.&#8221;</p>
<p>EliteXC was pushing Frank Shamrock is one of the best MMA fighters at the time.  Which was so far from reality.  It is the same reason I said Matt Hughes shouldn&#8217;t be getting a title shot after he beats Renzo.</p>
<p>These fights aren&#8217;t bad in themselves.  It is when they promote them as meaning something beyond that (which EliteXC did), that it is bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Conceicao</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-3/#comment-70264</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Conceicao</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:12:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70264</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I said he’ll be cut when he loses so many times they can’t justify keeping him anymore. That’s not an opinion, that’s fact.&lt;/i&gt;

How does that disprove the belief that he probably isn&#039;t better than fighters from the earliest years of the sport? You&#039;re all over the place. 

&lt;i&gt;Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it’s a widespread opinion.&lt;/i&gt;

If message boards were relevant, than no one would have bought Shamrock/Tito II or III, or watched Kimbo ever, etc etc etc.

&lt;i&gt;Look at what Rashad Evans knocking out Chuck Liddell did for him. He instantly became a superstar. Should they have wasted that fight on Liddell vs. Randleman II?&lt;/i&gt;

You&#039;re absolutely right. But Liddell was looking to be in title contention. He was willing to fight Rashad Evans. This brings us to...

&lt;i&gt;Why not run Koscheck-Hughes or Fitch-Hughes or Swick-Hughes instead of “UFC 109: Age In The Cage.”&lt;/i&gt;

Because Matt Hughes won&#039;t fight them for the money that they&#039;re offering. How difficult is that for you to understand? Unless the UFC is going to pay him a significantly (and 25% or so based on *potential* PPV bonuses isn&#039;t enough) higher amount of money to fight Josh Koscheck than Renzo Gracie, it is foolish of Matt to take the fight. Period. Point blank. Matt knows it, Joe Silva knows it, Matt&#039;s manager knows it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I said he’ll be cut when he loses so many times they can’t justify keeping him anymore. That’s not an opinion, that’s fact.</i></p>
<p>How does that disprove the belief that he probably isn&#8217;t better than fighters from the earliest years of the sport? You&#8217;re all over the place. </p>
<p><i>Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it’s a widespread opinion.</i></p>
<p>If message boards were relevant, than no one would have bought Shamrock/Tito II or III, or watched Kimbo ever, etc etc etc.</p>
<p><i>Look at what Rashad Evans knocking out Chuck Liddell did for him. He instantly became a superstar. Should they have wasted that fight on Liddell vs. Randleman II?</i></p>
<p>You&#8217;re absolutely right. But Liddell was looking to be in title contention. He was willing to fight Rashad Evans. This brings us to&#8230;</p>
<p><i>Why not run Koscheck-Hughes or Fitch-Hughes or Swick-Hughes instead of “UFC 109: Age In The Cage.”</i></p>
<p>Because Matt Hughes won&#8217;t fight them for the money that they&#8217;re offering. How difficult is that for you to understand? Unless the UFC is going to pay him a significantly (and 25% or so based on *potential* PPV bonuses isn&#8217;t enough) higher amount of money to fight Josh Koscheck than Renzo Gracie, it is foolish of Matt to take the fight. Period. Point blank. Matt knows it, Joe Silva knows it, Matt&#8217;s manager knows it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-3/#comment-70263</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70263</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a &quot;I think IFL is better than UFC&quot; oddball opinion, it&#039;s a very populist opinion, though. If someone were to ask fans at the next UFC event if they care about the Gracie family in 2009 you&#039;d get a resounding no.

&lt;blockquote&gt;I do think the UFC can sell Hughes vs. Renzo properly and make it a stron co-main event. But don’t let those message boards fool you.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course you like it, the UFC is doing it and they&#039;re always correct and never wrong. But you didn&#039;t have much respect for Shamrock-Gracie because Elite did it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a &#8220;I think IFL is better than UFC&#8221; oddball opinion, it&#8217;s a very populist opinion, though. If someone were to ask fans at the next UFC event if they care about the Gracie family in 2009 you&#8217;d get a resounding no.</p>
<blockquote><p>I do think the UFC can sell Hughes vs. Renzo properly and make it a stron co-main event. But don’t let those message boards fool you.</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course you like it, the UFC is doing it and they&#8217;re always correct and never wrong. But you didn&#8217;t have much respect for Shamrock-Gracie because Elite did it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-3/#comment-70261</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70261</guid>
		<description>&quot;Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it’s a widespread opinion.&quot;

Message boards are a suedo reality that have very little basis of real life.

How many organizations tried to cater to the needs of these message boards?  The IFL, Affliction, Bodog, EliteXC... The list continues....

The UFC was also very guilty of this when they first bought the company.  It wasn&#039;t uncommon for the key memebers of the company to take what was said on The Underground and try and apply it to what they were doing with their events.

Whether it be a website concerning cars, electronics, MMA, or anything else... The needs and wants of those devoted consumers is completely different with what the main stream consumer wants in a product.

So basing anything off of that is stupid.

That doesn&#039;t mean that your conclusion isn&#039;t correct.  I do think the UFC can sell Hughes vs. Renzo properly and make it a stron co-main event.  But don&#039;t let those message boards fool you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it’s a widespread opinion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Message boards are a suedo reality that have very little basis of real life.</p>
<p>How many organizations tried to cater to the needs of these message boards?  The IFL, Affliction, Bodog, EliteXC&#8230; The list continues&#8230;.</p>
<p>The UFC was also very guilty of this when they first bought the company.  It wasn&#8217;t uncommon for the key memebers of the company to take what was said on The Underground and try and apply it to what they were doing with their events.</p>
<p>Whether it be a website concerning cars, electronics, MMA, or anything else&#8230; The needs and wants of those devoted consumers is completely different with what the main stream consumer wants in a product.</p>
<p>So basing anything off of that is stupid.</p>
<p>That doesn&#8217;t mean that your conclusion isn&#8217;t correct.  I do think the UFC can sell Hughes vs. Renzo properly and make it a stron co-main event.  But don&#8217;t let those message boards fool you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2009/11/09/the-limitations-of-the-cbsshowtime-model-for-strikeforce/comment-page-3/#comment-70259</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/?p=5120#comment-70259</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;He’s not going to be cut because of that opinion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Man, your reading comprehension sucks today. I said he&#039;ll be cut when he loses so many times they can&#039;t justify keeping him anymore. That&#039;s not an opinion, that&#039;s fact.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Where? Sherdog? Sherdog is irrelevant.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Really? It&#039;s a really large community that whether you think they&#039;re mostly comprised of idiots or not (and I&#039;d hardly confuse the place with a Mensa website) the power of numbers makes it very relevant.

Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it&#039;s a widespread opinion.

&lt;blockquote&gt;What is impossible to grasp?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

That you can&#039;t grasp that I can&#039;t grasp you grasping the thought this Senior&#039;s Circuit fight is going to have a large number of people grasping their telephones or remote controls to order it?

&lt;blockquote&gt;As such, just feeding them to young fighters is not something they’re going to want to do. There’s no money in that. There’s a reason Tito went from Coleman to Griffin instead of fighting Luis Cane.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Look at what Rashad Evans knocking out Chuck Liddell did for him. He instantly became a superstar. Should they have wasted that fight on Liddell vs. Randleman II? Why not run Koscheck-Hughes or Fitch-Hughes or Swick-Hughes instead of &quot;UFC 109: Age In The Cage.&quot;

You have to have some kind of legitimacy, so Luis Cane who isn&#039;t popular by any stretch of the imagination right now wouldn&#039;t benefit from fighting Tito. But someone with legitimacy who just needs that extra boost to put them over the top would be far wiser than giving him Grandpa Coleman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>He’s not going to be cut because of that opinion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Man, your reading comprehension sucks today. I said he&#8217;ll be cut when he loses so many times they can&#8217;t justify keeping him anymore. That&#8217;s not an opinion, that&#8217;s fact.</p>
<blockquote><p>Where? Sherdog? Sherdog is irrelevant.</p></blockquote>
<p>Really? It&#8217;s a really large community that whether you think they&#8217;re mostly comprised of idiots or not (and I&#8217;d hardly confuse the place with a Mensa website) the power of numbers makes it very relevant.</p>
<p>Message boards are like a poll: if you see a trend of a large number of people out of a sample poll all saying the same thing, then you can assume it&#8217;s a widespread opinion.</p>
<blockquote><p>What is impossible to grasp?</p></blockquote>
<p>That you can&#8217;t grasp that I can&#8217;t grasp you grasping the thought this Senior&#8217;s Circuit fight is going to have a large number of people grasping their telephones or remote controls to order it?</p>
<blockquote><p>As such, just feeding them to young fighters is not something they’re going to want to do. There’s no money in that. There’s a reason Tito went from Coleman to Griffin instead of fighting Luis Cane.</p></blockquote>
<p>Look at what Rashad Evans knocking out Chuck Liddell did for him. He instantly became a superstar. Should they have wasted that fight on Liddell vs. Randleman II? Why not run Koscheck-Hughes or Fitch-Hughes or Swick-Hughes instead of &#8220;UFC 109: Age In The Cage.&#8221;</p>
<p>You have to have some kind of legitimacy, so Luis Cane who isn&#8217;t popular by any stretch of the imagination right now wouldn&#8217;t benefit from fighting Tito. But someone with legitimacy who just needs that extra boost to put them over the top would be far wiser than giving him Grandpa Coleman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

