<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Josh Barnett: Dave Meltzer report on Affliction pay cuts is not true</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51727</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 02:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51727</guid>
		<description>I never saw what Meltzer said, but my understanding is that some fighters were approached about getting easier fights for less money. 

Barnett obviously would not be one of these guys since he will be headlining.

Not sure if that jives with Meltzer&#039;s comments or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never saw what Meltzer said, but my understanding is that some fighters were approached about getting easier fights for less money. </p>
<p>Barnett obviously would not be one of these guys since he will be headlining.</p>
<p>Not sure if that jives with Meltzer&#8217;s comments or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolf Rosenstein</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51604</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf Rosenstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 07:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51604</guid>
		<description>Barnett has a well documented past with Affliction that predates any other fighter besides Justin Levens, Randy included.

Seems more like Josh setting the record straight than responding due to being in trouble.

Double R</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barnett has a well documented past with Affliction that predates any other fighter besides Justin Levens, Randy included.</p>
<p>Seems more like Josh setting the record straight than responding due to being in trouble.</p>
<p>Double R</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51600</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 06:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51600</guid>
		<description>Sounds like Barnett got in hot water with Affliction for his comment and is playing the &quot;blame the media&quot; card.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like Barnett got in hot water with Affliction for his comment and is playing the &#8220;blame the media&#8221; card.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grape Knee High</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51592</link>
		<dc:creator>Grape Knee High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 01:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51592</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;And the PPV’s might be “Loss Leaders”, but if a PPV is only getting 75k in PPV buys, then the cost of running a MMA show will not make up the difference. And even a company as reckless as Affliction will figure this out.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Agreed, this is no doubt true.

However, what I&#039;m specifically wondering is whether the amount that Affliction doled out in sponsorship money for a typical UFC PPV before they got banned might be approximately what they are intending on losing each show.

(I suspect they are losing more than what they paid in sponsorships, but I&#039;m just trying to see from Affliction&#039;s viewpoint why they might be employing such a financially retarded strategy.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>And the PPV’s might be “Loss Leaders”, but if a PPV is only getting 75k in PPV buys, then the cost of running a MMA show will not make up the difference. And even a company as reckless as Affliction will figure this out.</p></blockquote>
<p>Agreed, this is no doubt true.</p>
<p>However, what I&#8217;m specifically wondering is whether the amount that Affliction doled out in sponsorship money for a typical UFC PPV before they got banned might be approximately what they are intending on losing each show.</p>
<p>(I suspect they are losing more than what they paid in sponsorships, but I&#8217;m just trying to see from Affliction&#8217;s viewpoint why they might be employing such a financially retarded strategy.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51591</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 00:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51591</guid>
		<description>Affliction might have earned a lot of cash, but it would not shock me to see the owners taking the majority of the profits out of the company. That is very typical for a company such as this.

And the PPV&#039;s might be &quot;Loss Leaders&quot;, but if a PPV is only getting 75k in PPV buys, then the cost of running a MMA show will not make up the difference.  And even a company as reckless as Affliction will figure this out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affliction might have earned a lot of cash, but it would not shock me to see the owners taking the majority of the profits out of the company. That is very typical for a company such as this.</p>
<p>And the PPV&#8217;s might be &#8220;Loss Leaders&#8221;, but if a PPV is only getting 75k in PPV buys, then the cost of running a MMA show will not make up the difference.  And even a company as reckless as Affliction will figure this out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grape Knee High</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51589</link>
		<dc:creator>Grape Knee High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51589</guid>
		<description>Also, let me note that Affliction might be sitting on a huge pile of cash.  Business Week noted last week that Tapout will gross around $100 million this year.  I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to hear that Affliction is grossing comparable numbers (or better).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, let me note that Affliction might be sitting on a huge pile of cash.  Business Week noted last week that Tapout will gross around $100 million this year.  I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to hear that Affliction is grossing comparable numbers (or better).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grape Knee High</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51588</link>
		<dc:creator>Grape Knee High</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 23:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51588</guid>
		<description>Anyone have any idea just how much in sponsorship money Affliction was paying to fighters per UFC card before they were banned?

It seems unlikely that they were shelling out in excess of even $1 million per PPV in sponsorship money, but anything seems possible to me given how financially reckless they&#039;ve been with fighter salaries so far.

Perhaps Affliction views a PPV as a loss leader to sell t-shirts.  Who knows, maybe they&#039;re making money that way.  If all it takes is millions of fashion- retarded douchebags to buy ridiculously overpriced t-shirts for us to have great MMA cards, I&#039;m all for it.

Unfortunately, I have trouble seeing how they won&#039;t be going out of business soon, not solely because of their unprofitable MMA shows, but because their type of &quot;fashion&quot; is of the type that comes and goes very quickly.  Douchebag kids tend to be fickle with their douchebag fashion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone have any idea just how much in sponsorship money Affliction was paying to fighters per UFC card before they were banned?</p>
<p>It seems unlikely that they were shelling out in excess of even $1 million per PPV in sponsorship money, but anything seems possible to me given how financially reckless they&#8217;ve been with fighter salaries so far.</p>
<p>Perhaps Affliction views a PPV as a loss leader to sell t-shirts.  Who knows, maybe they&#8217;re making money that way.  If all it takes is millions of fashion- retarded douchebags to buy ridiculously overpriced t-shirts for us to have great MMA cards, I&#8217;m all for it.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I have trouble seeing how they won&#8217;t be going out of business soon, not solely because of their unprofitable MMA shows, but because their type of &#8220;fashion&#8221; is of the type that comes and goes very quickly.  Douchebag kids tend to be fickle with their douchebag fashion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samscaff</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51586</link>
		<dc:creator>samscaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51586</guid>
		<description>First of all, I am not guaranteeing any success for Affliction whatsoever, but...

Each one of other fledgling MMA companies (IFL, EliteXC, WFA, Bodog) THOUGHT they had a solid plan for success...but they didnt.

Trust me when I say that myself and many others knew that the IFL &quot;plan&quot; involving teams was doomed to be a failure. I said it at the time and I was 100% right.  EliteXC, buying up almost all the 2nd-tier promotions right off the bat before they even established themselves, was also not a great idea. And TV deals or not, they have no real star fighters. As for the others, well their failures speak for themselves.

So far, IMO, Affliction has had the best plan for starting a promotion to challenge the UFC.  History has clearly shown us that stars are what make money in fighting. Boxing and UFC have both proven that. Thats why the IFL was doomed to failure. Teams for sport based on individual success?  It was a joke.  None of the other organizations (besides UFC) have true MMA stars...except for Affliction.  While they may not all be hugely popular in America yet, guys like Fedor and Barnett are true stars in the sport of MMA, both with exceptional skills. Arlovski already is a star in the American fight scene. Well-known, credible foils like Sylvia are also a must, since we all saw how well Fedor-Lindland went over for both Fedor and Bodog. 

In any case, I think it is clear that if there was a way to beat the UFC, Affliction is trying it. While they lost money on the first show on paper, there is no way to quantify, at this point, how valuable the event was in terms of promotion and marketing of the brand/event.  We will have to wait and see. I&#039;m not saying they will definitely be successful, but I think they definitely have the best chance of anyone so far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I am not guaranteeing any success for Affliction whatsoever, but&#8230;</p>
<p>Each one of other fledgling MMA companies (IFL, EliteXC, WFA, Bodog) THOUGHT they had a solid plan for success&#8230;but they didnt.</p>
<p>Trust me when I say that myself and many others knew that the IFL &#8220;plan&#8221; involving teams was doomed to be a failure. I said it at the time and I was 100% right.  EliteXC, buying up almost all the 2nd-tier promotions right off the bat before they even established themselves, was also not a great idea. And TV deals or not, they have no real star fighters. As for the others, well their failures speak for themselves.</p>
<p>So far, IMO, Affliction has had the best plan for starting a promotion to challenge the UFC.  History has clearly shown us that stars are what make money in fighting. Boxing and UFC have both proven that. Thats why the IFL was doomed to failure. Teams for sport based on individual success?  It was a joke.  None of the other organizations (besides UFC) have true MMA stars&#8230;except for Affliction.  While they may not all be hugely popular in America yet, guys like Fedor and Barnett are true stars in the sport of MMA, both with exceptional skills. Arlovski already is a star in the American fight scene. Well-known, credible foils like Sylvia are also a must, since we all saw how well Fedor-Lindland went over for both Fedor and Bodog. </p>
<p>In any case, I think it is clear that if there was a way to beat the UFC, Affliction is trying it. While they lost money on the first show on paper, there is no way to quantify, at this point, how valuable the event was in terms of promotion and marketing of the brand/event.  We will have to wait and see. I&#8217;m not saying they will definitely be successful, but I think they definitely have the best chance of anyone so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceMuncher</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51585</link>
		<dc:creator>IceMuncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51585</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Tito&#039;s the big PPV draw he once was.  Some casual fans may still like him, but it&#039;s only the more hardcore portion of the fanbase that&#039;s going to order a non-UFC pay-per-view.  They&#039;re not mindless sheep.  They&#039;ve seen Tito&#039;s last three fights, they know he&#039;s mediocre and they&#039;ve lost a lot of interest in him.  A name only takes you so far before you get replaced and forgotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Tito&#8217;s the big PPV draw he once was.  Some casual fans may still like him, but it&#8217;s only the more hardcore portion of the fanbase that&#8217;s going to order a non-UFC pay-per-view.  They&#8217;re not mindless sheep.  They&#8217;ve seen Tito&#8217;s last three fights, they know he&#8217;s mediocre and they&#8217;ve lost a lot of interest in him.  A name only takes you so far before you get replaced and forgotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyph</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/comment-page-1/#comment-51584</link>
		<dc:creator>cyph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 22:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/08/03/josh-barnett-dave-meltzer-report-on-affliction-pay-cuts-is-not-true/#comment-51584</guid>
		<description>Affliction 2 will prove once and for all that Tito Ortiz does not sell PPV with his name only. He may be popular, but in the fighting game, you have to to win to sell.

People bought into Tito when he was thought of as unstoppable. Liddell&#039;s fall from grace was also the turning point of the UFC&#039;s falling buy rates. Tito was only half of the Liddell VS Ortiz 1 million buy UFC 66. Without the UFC name, what makes people think that Tito can still sell after being exposed as a mid tier fighter these past few years? 

Look at Ken Shamrock. He&#039;s half of the Ortiz VS Shamrock 775k PPV buys. Now that he&#039;s exposed as over the hill, he couldn&#039;t sell PPV if he life&#039;s depended on it.

This isn&#039;t pro wrestling. You have to win for fans to want to watch you fight. Unfortunately, Tito Ortiz hasn&#039;t won anything significant in the last few years other than beating Ken Shamrock.

P.S. Nice to see FO back online after being missing for most of the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Affliction 2 will prove once and for all that Tito Ortiz does not sell PPV with his name only. He may be popular, but in the fighting game, you have to to win to sell.</p>
<p>People bought into Tito when he was thought of as unstoppable. Liddell&#8217;s fall from grace was also the turning point of the UFC&#8217;s falling buy rates. Tito was only half of the Liddell VS Ortiz 1 million buy UFC 66. Without the UFC name, what makes people think that Tito can still sell after being exposed as a mid tier fighter these past few years? </p>
<p>Look at Ken Shamrock. He&#8217;s half of the Ortiz VS Shamrock 775k PPV buys. Now that he&#8217;s exposed as over the hill, he couldn&#8217;t sell PPV if he life&#8217;s depended on it.</p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t pro wrestling. You have to win for fans to want to watch you fight. Unfortunately, Tito Ortiz hasn&#8217;t won anything significant in the last few years other than beating Ken Shamrock.</p>
<p>P.S. Nice to see FO back online after being missing for most of the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

