<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ABC-proposed changes to Unified Rules of MMA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:37:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: D. Capitated</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50765</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Capitated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50765</guid>
		<description>The reason why its a grouping of boxing commissions is because in virtually every state MMA is in, it is under the guise of a boxing commssion. That is the purpose of the CSAC, the NJSAC, the NSAC, and so on, all of whom are members. They are boxing commissions. That is why they are there.Asking why a organization that has &quot;boxing&quot; in the name would be involved when everyone you&#039;re talking about is BOXING COMMISSION is idiocy. That the NSAC wasn&#039;t there isn&#039;t because they don&#039;t respect it but because they were busy this weekend, and remain a member. 

The prior unified rules set had been brought to them years ago, and the purpose of the ABC is to create or suggest unified rules sets for all state and indian commissions in the US/US Territories. This is so cut and dry, I am not sure what the confusion is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason why its a grouping of boxing commissions is because in virtually every state MMA is in, it is under the guise of a boxing commssion. That is the purpose of the CSAC, the NJSAC, the NSAC, and so on, all of whom are members. They are boxing commissions. That is why they are there.Asking why a organization that has &#8220;boxing&#8221; in the name would be involved when everyone you&#8217;re talking about is BOXING COMMISSION is idiocy. That the NSAC wasn&#8217;t there isn&#8217;t because they don&#8217;t respect it but because they were busy this weekend, and remain a member. </p>
<p>The prior unified rules set had been brought to them years ago, and the purpose of the ABC is to create or suggest unified rules sets for all state and indian commissions in the US/US Territories. This is so cut and dry, I am not sure what the confusion is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceMuncher</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50747</link>
		<dc:creator>IceMuncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50747</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do you get what the ABC stands for? Do you understand that it is not a sanctioning body?&quot;

Yes.  I also know what the B stands for, which is why I was wondering why the heck they&#039;ve put it on themselves to create &quot;unified&quot; MMA rules without the presence of the UFC, which makes up over 90% of the sport, and without the presence of the  major athletic commissions like the NSAC.  Let me ask you this, what level of involvement in MMA has the ABC had before this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do you get what the ABC stands for? Do you understand that it is not a sanctioning body?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes.  I also know what the B stands for, which is why I was wondering why the heck they&#8217;ve put it on themselves to create &#8220;unified&#8221; MMA rules without the presence of the UFC, which makes up over 90% of the sport, and without the presence of the  major athletic commissions like the NSAC.  Let me ask you this, what level of involvement in MMA has the ABC had before this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50732</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50732</guid>
		<description>Being a member of a committee does not mean that you approve of everything that is in a document that comes out of that committee.  That&#039;s kind of the nature of the beast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a member of a committee does not mean that you approve of everything that is in a document that comes out of that committee.  That&#8217;s kind of the nature of the beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50731</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 01:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50731</guid>
		<description>Mick, my understanding is that although his name was on the document, the California commission did not attend the meetings.

Draw your own conclusions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick, my understanding is that although his name was on the document, the California commission did not attend the meetings.</p>
<p>Draw your own conclusions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MickDawg</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50730</link>
		<dc:creator>MickDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 23:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50730</guid>
		<description>Mick, yeah, I read the document.

Just because someone’s name is on it 

doesn’t mean that they intend to actually implement the rules.

---------------------------------------

I think you&#039;re grasping.  

If someone&#039;s name is on it as the preparer...that means they plan to do it.  

In the off chance that they do not implement it, means they are a hypocrite and they lose their credibility.

What was so hard about saying no during the voting process?  

I&#039;m sure they received feedback from a lot of people about these rule changes.  The consensus is that it&#039;s a good thing.  Please stop assuming the commissions are dumbasses that don&#039;t know what is good for the sport.

---------------------------------------

Rollo the Cat Says:

“Gives these guys more chances to make more money.”

So that’s it? What about the sport? What about the joke this makes out of MMA titles? What about the fans? Sorry, but the new weight classes are not good for the sport and neither are some of the other new rules. The fighters can still make plenty money without me wishing bad things on MMA.

---------------------------------------

What about the fans?

You&#039;re telling me fights won&#039;t be as exciting because there&#039;s more weight classes?  

If anything, there&#039;s a weight class in between where we can see the fighters perform better.  Wanderlei might&#039;ve made 185, but for sure he could make 195 and fight more comfortably.  A Silva vs Silva match at 195.  Sign me up!  Penn vs Diego at 165?  Cool.

Everybody knows that no matter what, the hardcore fans will watch.  
They will accept the weight classes cuz we just want to see fights.

And the casual fan?  They care about the matchup.  This opens up a lot of possibilities.  How else can Tito vs Shamrock draw good ratings three times?

Basically, you&#039;re just assuming this isn&#039;t good for the sport.

Names of the divisions (you&#039;ll get used to it)  

Watered down championships (they&#039;ll be worthy title holders)  How about Wanderlei at 195? Or Diego Sanchez at 165?

The sport will proceed as normal...and the matchups will be more even. 

I don&#039;t have any evidence that this would help or hurt the sport itself in any way, but neither do you.

It&#039;s all assumptions...and I assume the sport will proceed as normal.  Give me the matchups I want, and I believe this sport will grow just as it has been doing for the past 3+ years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick, yeah, I read the document.</p>
<p>Just because someone’s name is on it </p>
<p>doesn’t mean that they intend to actually implement the rules.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re grasping.  </p>
<p>If someone&#8217;s name is on it as the preparer&#8230;that means they plan to do it.  </p>
<p>In the off chance that they do not implement it, means they are a hypocrite and they lose their credibility.</p>
<p>What was so hard about saying no during the voting process?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they received feedback from a lot of people about these rule changes.  The consensus is that it&#8217;s a good thing.  Please stop assuming the commissions are dumbasses that don&#8217;t know what is good for the sport.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>Rollo the Cat Says:</p>
<p>“Gives these guys more chances to make more money.”</p>
<p>So that’s it? What about the sport? What about the joke this makes out of MMA titles? What about the fans? Sorry, but the new weight classes are not good for the sport and neither are some of the other new rules. The fighters can still make plenty money without me wishing bad things on MMA.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>What about the fans?</p>
<p>You&#8217;re telling me fights won&#8217;t be as exciting because there&#8217;s more weight classes?  </p>
<p>If anything, there&#8217;s a weight class in between where we can see the fighters perform better.  Wanderlei might&#8217;ve made 185, but for sure he could make 195 and fight more comfortably.  A Silva vs Silva match at 195.  Sign me up!  Penn vs Diego at 165?  Cool.</p>
<p>Everybody knows that no matter what, the hardcore fans will watch.<br />
They will accept the weight classes cuz we just want to see fights.</p>
<p>And the casual fan?  They care about the matchup.  This opens up a lot of possibilities.  How else can Tito vs Shamrock draw good ratings three times?</p>
<p>Basically, you&#8217;re just assuming this isn&#8217;t good for the sport.</p>
<p>Names of the divisions (you&#8217;ll get used to it)  </p>
<p>Watered down championships (they&#8217;ll be worthy title holders)  How about Wanderlei at 195? Or Diego Sanchez at 165?</p>
<p>The sport will proceed as normal&#8230;and the matchups will be more even. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any evidence that this would help or hurt the sport itself in any way, but neither do you.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all assumptions&#8230;and I assume the sport will proceed as normal.  Give me the matchups I want, and I believe this sport will grow just as it has been doing for the past 3+ years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50728</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50728</guid>
		<description>Mick, yeah, I read the document.

Just because someone&#039;s name is on it doesn&#039;t mean that they intend to actually implement the rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mick, yeah, I read the document.</p>
<p>Just because someone&#8217;s name is on it doesn&#8217;t mean that they intend to actually implement the rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo the Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50727</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo the Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 18:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50727</guid>
		<description>&quot;Gives these guys more chances to make more money.&quot;

So that&#039;s it?  What about the sport?  What about the joke this makes out of MMA titles?  What about the fans?  Sorry, but the new weight classes are not good for the sport and neither are some of the other new rules.  The fighters can still make plenty money without me wishing bad things on MMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Gives these guys more chances to make more money.&#8221;</p>
<p>So that&#8217;s it?  What about the sport?  What about the joke this makes out of MMA titles?  What about the fans?  Sorry, but the new weight classes are not good for the sport and neither are some of the other new rules.  The fighters can still make plenty money without me wishing bad things on MMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50726</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50726</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very easy to see why Zuffa will have nothing to do with the new weight classes.

Quinton Jackson is now the World Super Middleweight Champion

Anderson Silva is now the World Super Welterweight Champion

Say each of those out loud 5 times.  Laugh a little, and then understand how much of a joke this is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very easy to see why Zuffa will have nothing to do with the new weight classes.</p>
<p>Quinton Jackson is now the World Super Middleweight Champion</p>
<p>Anderson Silva is now the World Super Welterweight Champion</p>
<p>Say each of those out loud 5 times.  Laugh a little, and then understand how much of a joke this is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MickDawg</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50725</link>
		<dc:creator>MickDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50725</guid>
		<description>Yeah, Kizer wasn&#039;t enthusiastic about the 225 weight class.  

He just needs more answers.  Doesn&#039;t mean he won&#039;t be doing it.

Quote: &quot;The NSAC typically reviews rules on an annual basis, with the next assessment expected next year.&quot;

Like I said earlier, I don&#039;t like the 225 either.  It&#039;s going overboard, but I have no problem with the others.

Gives these guys more chances to make more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, Kizer wasn&#8217;t enthusiastic about the 225 weight class.  </p>
<p>He just needs more answers.  Doesn&#8217;t mean he won&#8217;t be doing it.</p>
<p>Quote: &#8220;The NSAC typically reviews rules on an annual basis, with the next assessment expected next year.&#8221;</p>
<p>Like I said earlier, I don&#8217;t like the 225 either.  It&#8217;s going overboard, but I have no problem with the others.</p>
<p>Gives these guys more chances to make more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo the Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/comment-page-1/#comment-50724</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo the Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 15:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/07/04/abc-proposed-changes-to-unified-rules-of-mma/#comment-50724</guid>
		<description>Kizer was already interviewed about this and he didn&#039;t sound very enthusiastic.  He said NV had no intention of adopting these changes, at least for a year or so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kizer was already interviewed about this and he didn&#8217;t sound very enthusiastic.  He said NV had no intention of adopting these changes, at least for a year or so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

