<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFC 81 (2/2 Las Vegas)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47262</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 06:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47262</guid>
		<description>&quot;Is every PRIDE fighter that does well in the UFC an exception?&quot;

Yes, can&#039;t you see how this argument works?  It&#039;s the most convenient explanation and therefore it&#039;s true.

Proof that PRIDE fighters cheat is when they lose fights, when they are dominant and win fights - they are the exception.  Except the &quot;exception&quot; is growing with each event.

&quot;Damn, man. Just use some logic instead of arguing for argument’s sake!&quot;

It&#039;s just as easy to use logic to say that it&#039;s been proven time and again that the AC testing is easily manipulated.  So are we to believe people aren&#039;t manipulating it b/c they are noble warriors with a strong sense of ethics?

My point being - the sword cuts both ways.  You can&#039;t have your cake and eat it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Is every PRIDE fighter that does well in the UFC an exception?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, can&#8217;t you see how this argument works?  It&#8217;s the most convenient explanation and therefore it&#8217;s true.</p>
<p>Proof that PRIDE fighters cheat is when they lose fights, when they are dominant and win fights &#8211; they are the exception.  Except the &#8220;exception&#8221; is growing with each event.</p>
<p>&#8220;Damn, man. Just use some logic instead of arguing for argument’s sake!&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s just as easy to use logic to say that it&#8217;s been proven time and again that the AC testing is easily manipulated.  So are we to believe people aren&#8217;t manipulating it b/c they are noble warriors with a strong sense of ethics?</p>
<p>My point being &#8211; the sword cuts both ways.  You can&#8217;t have your cake and eat it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47242</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47242</guid>
		<description>While you would think there would be more steroid abuse in Japan because it&#039;s legal there, we have no evidence of this. Those who say &quot;Chute Boxe was juicing but Rampage, Nogueira and Anderson Silva (who was in chute boxe btw) were clean!&quot; are just speculating. No one has any proof that they were juicing. PRIDE haters are using Nogueira, Rampage and Anderson Silva as exceptions to justify their speculation that PRIDE fighters = juicers. What about Dan Henderson? He faired very well against Rampage for being such a small guy. Is Dan one of those exceptions too? Is every PRIDE fighter that does well in the UFC an exception?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While you would think there would be more steroid abuse in Japan because it&#8217;s legal there, we have no evidence of this. Those who say &#8220;Chute Boxe was juicing but Rampage, Nogueira and Anderson Silva (who was in chute boxe btw) were clean!&#8221; are just speculating. No one has any proof that they were juicing. PRIDE haters are using Nogueira, Rampage and Anderson Silva as exceptions to justify their speculation that PRIDE fighters = juicers. What about Dan Henderson? He faired very well against Rampage for being such a small guy. Is Dan one of those exceptions too? Is every PRIDE fighter that does well in the UFC an exception?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyphron</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47228</link>
		<dc:creator>cyphron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47228</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But hey - it’s the one team from Brazil, fighting in Japan that’s breaking all the rules.

Convenient and horseshit argument you have there isn’t it?

&lt;/i&gt;

Fighters in the US are caught abusing drugs even when they are tested.

Fighters in Japan are not tested. Is it a reach of logic to conclude that there is rampant steroid abuse there, far more than they are here where steroid testing is implemented?

Are you saying that fighters fighting in Japan refrain from using steroids because they are noble warriors with a strong sense of ethics?

Damn, man. Just use some logic instead of arguing for argument&#039;s sake!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But hey &#8211; it’s the one team from Brazil, fighting in Japan that’s breaking all the rules.</p>
<p>Convenient and horseshit argument you have there isn’t it?</p>
<p></i></p>
<p>Fighters in the US are caught abusing drugs even when they are tested.</p>
<p>Fighters in Japan are not tested. Is it a reach of logic to conclude that there is rampant steroid abuse there, far more than they are here where steroid testing is implemented?</p>
<p>Are you saying that fighters fighting in Japan refrain from using steroids because they are noble warriors with a strong sense of ethics?</p>
<p>Damn, man. Just use some logic instead of arguing for argument&#8217;s sake!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47211</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 17:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47211</guid>
		<description>&quot;If you take away elbows and knees, it reduces your options and that’s moving away from what MMA is about.&quot;

Naw, it&#039;s still MMA without them.  Without them it is straying away from it&#039;s foundations, when everyone was calling it Vale Tudo, which translates into &quot;No Holds Barred&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If you take away elbows and knees, it reduces your options and that’s moving away from what MMA is about.&#8221;</p>
<p>Naw, it&#8217;s still MMA without them.  Without them it is straying away from it&#8217;s foundations, when everyone was calling it Vale Tudo, which translates into &#8220;No Holds Barred&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47194</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 14:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47194</guid>
		<description>Never understood the criticism of elbows. The percentage of fights stopped by cuts from elbows is something like 2%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never understood the criticism of elbows. The percentage of fights stopped by cuts from elbows is something like 2%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GameCritics.com</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47184</link>
		<dc:creator>GameCritics.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 07:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47184</guid>
		<description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;In the UFC it’s very common to see guys use elbows to cut a guy and you saw that a lot in UFC 80. No one wants to see a cut stoppage and it’s cheap to cut a guy intentionally with an elbow and then work a cut hoping for stoppage. Fans generally boo when fights end like that.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt; Yeah, there were a lot of cuts in UFC 80, but none of the fights were stopped because of it. I agree with what Big John said about elbows. The true spirit of MMA is about blending and utilizing anything that available. That&#039;s what makes MMA so exciting because anything can happen. If you consider yourself a MMA purist, you have to support both elbows and knees because they both add a different dimension to the game. If you take away elbows and knees, it reduces your options and that&#039;s moving away from what MMA is about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>In the UFC it’s very common to see guys use elbows to cut a guy and you saw that a lot in UFC 80. No one wants to see a cut stoppage and it’s cheap to cut a guy intentionally with an elbow and then work a cut hoping for stoppage. Fans generally boo when fights end like that.</p></blockquote>
<p> Yeah, there were a lot of cuts in UFC 80, but none of the fights were stopped because of it. I agree with what Big John said about elbows. The true spirit of MMA is about blending and utilizing anything that available. That&#8217;s what makes MMA so exciting because anything can happen. If you consider yourself a MMA purist, you have to support both elbows and knees because they both add a different dimension to the game. If you take away elbows and knees, it reduces your options and that&#8217;s moving away from what MMA is about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47175</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47175</guid>
		<description>&quot;If anything, I’m even more impressed that Fedor dominated in an organization filled with so many steroid abusers. He’s better than Rampage that’s for sure. Rampage could never get over the hump of fighting the steroid-abusing Chute box academy.&quot;

I LOVE that this is the argument that&#039;s always put up by people when it appears their shitty steroid argument doesn&#039;t hold as much water as they thought it did before.

I guess in an organization where you just assume everyone was taking part in rampant steroid abuse, you then just change your argument to state that &quot;everyone abused steroids in the organization....except for fighter A.&quot;  Right...the entire Chute Boxe team abused steroids and that was it!  They were the only team that found the loophole in the system...*rolls eyes*  This is the best argument you can come up with?  Everyone cheated - except for the guys its most convenient for my argument to mean f*ck all.
 
Yep - that makes the most sense.  It&#039;s either one of two things: 
*(a) Since it was known there was no testing - everyone was abusing the PEDs and so it was just as even a playing field b/c everyone was on something; or 

*(b) it&#039;s nowhere near the levels you&#039;d love to make it out to be and likely isn&#039;t any different than the current IQ test that happens in the US.

Funny that the argument just changes every time that it becomes convenient to change it.

Let me ask you a few brain teasers:

What&#039;s the &quot;performance enhancing drug of choice&quot; amongst athletes these days?  - HGH.  

What&#039;s a drug that&#039;s never tested for in by any athletic commission in the US or in Japan?
- HGH.

What country has been proven at least in the last 10 years (if not for longer) to be among the worst, if not the worst of &quot;doping&quot; nations?
- The US.

What country has maybe the easiest access to illicit PED&#039;s via one of the most porous borders w/ the most unregulated medical system in the free world?
- The US via Mexico.

But hey - it&#039;s the one team from Brazil, fighting in Japan that&#039;s breaking all the rules.

Convenient and horseshit argument you have there isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If anything, I’m even more impressed that Fedor dominated in an organization filled with so many steroid abusers. He’s better than Rampage that’s for sure. Rampage could never get over the hump of fighting the steroid-abusing Chute box academy.&#8221;</p>
<p>I LOVE that this is the argument that&#8217;s always put up by people when it appears their shitty steroid argument doesn&#8217;t hold as much water as they thought it did before.</p>
<p>I guess in an organization where you just assume everyone was taking part in rampant steroid abuse, you then just change your argument to state that &#8220;everyone abused steroids in the organization&#8230;.except for fighter A.&#8221;  Right&#8230;the entire Chute Boxe team abused steroids and that was it!  They were the only team that found the loophole in the system&#8230;*rolls eyes*  This is the best argument you can come up with?  Everyone cheated &#8211; except for the guys its most convenient for my argument to mean f*ck all.</p>
<p>Yep &#8211; that makes the most sense.  It&#8217;s either one of two things:<br />
*(a) Since it was known there was no testing &#8211; everyone was abusing the PEDs and so it was just as even a playing field b/c everyone was on something; or </p>
<p>*(b) it&#8217;s nowhere near the levels you&#8217;d love to make it out to be and likely isn&#8217;t any different than the current IQ test that happens in the US.</p>
<p>Funny that the argument just changes every time that it becomes convenient to change it.</p>
<p>Let me ask you a few brain teasers:</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the &#8220;performance enhancing drug of choice&#8221; amongst athletes these days?  &#8211; HGH.  </p>
<p>What&#8217;s a drug that&#8217;s never tested for in by any athletic commission in the US or in Japan?<br />
- HGH.</p>
<p>What country has been proven at least in the last 10 years (if not for longer) to be among the worst, if not the worst of &#8220;doping&#8221; nations?<br />
- The US.</p>
<p>What country has maybe the easiest access to illicit PED&#8217;s via one of the most porous borders w/ the most unregulated medical system in the free world?<br />
- The US via Mexico.</p>
<p>But hey &#8211; it&#8217;s the one team from Brazil, fighting in Japan that&#8217;s breaking all the rules.</p>
<p>Convenient and horseshit argument you have there isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47174</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 03:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47174</guid>
		<description>I think Cage Rage&#039;s policy on elbows in the best. They are banned on the ground but legal standing. Standing elbows have KO power (see Anderson Silva&#039;s HL Elbow KO over Frkylund) whereas elbows on the ground cause cuts more than anything. In the UFC it&#039;s very common to see guys use elbows to cut a guy and you saw that a lot in UFC 80. No one wants to see a cut stoppage and it&#039;s cheap to cut a guy intentionally with an elbow and then work a cut hoping for stoppage. Fans generally boo when fights end like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Cage Rage&#8217;s policy on elbows in the best. They are banned on the ground but legal standing. Standing elbows have KO power (see Anderson Silva&#8217;s HL Elbow KO over Frkylund) whereas elbows on the ground cause cuts more than anything. In the UFC it&#8217;s very common to see guys use elbows to cut a guy and you saw that a lot in UFC 80. No one wants to see a cut stoppage and it&#8217;s cheap to cut a guy intentionally with an elbow and then work a cut hoping for stoppage. Fans generally boo when fights end like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 02:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47173</guid>
		<description>&quot;Mixed martial arts is about being inclusive not exclusive. The more you take out, the less it is MMA. If you support knees, you should support elbows. As to the argument that its cheap and its causes cuts, its a part of the game. I liked how the cut on Stevenson forced him to push the action and it made him push the action and that made it a much more dramatic and exciting fight. If fighters don’t want to get cut, they shouldn’t put themselves in a position to be cut.&quot;
PRIDE disallowed elbows to the head and it wasn&#039;t any less MMA. Just as UFC disallowing knees to the head, soccer kicks and stomps isn&#039;t any less MMA.

&quot;I love how on Inside MMA, every fighter they asked about elbows has no issue with it and despite all the great points that they raise in support of it, Bas is adamantly against elbows.&quot;
Frank Shamrock is also against elbows on the ground. He&#039;s ok with them used in standing Muay Thai though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Mixed martial arts is about being inclusive not exclusive. The more you take out, the less it is MMA. If you support knees, you should support elbows. As to the argument that its cheap and its causes cuts, its a part of the game. I liked how the cut on Stevenson forced him to push the action and it made him push the action and that made it a much more dramatic and exciting fight. If fighters don’t want to get cut, they shouldn’t put themselves in a position to be cut.&#8221;<br />
PRIDE disallowed elbows to the head and it wasn&#8217;t any less MMA. Just as UFC disallowing knees to the head, soccer kicks and stomps isn&#8217;t any less MMA.</p>
<p>&#8220;I love how on Inside MMA, every fighter they asked about elbows has no issue with it and despite all the great points that they raise in support of it, Bas is adamantly against elbows.&#8221;<br />
Frank Shamrock is also against elbows on the ground. He&#8217;s ok with them used in standing Muay Thai though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Capitated</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/comment-page-2/#comment-47161</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Capitated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 23:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/02/02/ufc-81-22-las-vegas/#comment-47161</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Are you not going to give Sylvia the credit HE deserves? If you had to write the up the review for the fight, I’d assume you would claim that Nogueira destroyed Sylvia, right?&lt;/i&gt;

Sylvia did about as well as Prime Mirko Cro Cop did, people. I doubt many people will want to make comparisons of 2003 Cro Cop and Big Tim though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Are you not going to give Sylvia the credit HE deserves? If you had to write the up the review for the fight, I’d assume you would claim that Nogueira destroyed Sylvia, right?</i></p>
<p>Sylvia did about as well as Prime Mirko Cro Cop did, people. I doubt many people will want to make comparisons of 2003 Cro Cop and Big Tim though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

