<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thursday trash talk: More UFC in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:47:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-47006</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 04:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-47006</guid>
		<description>&quot;As for boxing, we could only hope they unify the sanctioning bodies.  Things were a lot better in boxing when there was only one and when they had less weight classes. I’ll watch the Pavlik fight (actually I’ll d/l it because I can’t sit through HBO’s crappy undercards) but overall, I’m sticking to watching MMA and K-1. As a casual boxing fan, I can’t stand boxing these days.&quot;

Actually, boxing is better off now than it was &quot;back then&quot;.  Bro, good old days have never existed.  Boxing is at its cleanest right now in history.  I don&#039;t think there is much of a La Cosa Nostra influence in boxing nowadays.

And here is a little-known fact.  The titles have always been splintered.  Yup, since at least the forties or so.  There was always at least three or so &quot;world&quot; champs in each weight class.  It wasn&#039;t as big of a cluster fuck as today, but still.  I think the best source for rankings and champs is Ring Magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As for boxing, we could only hope they unify the sanctioning bodies.  Things were a lot better in boxing when there was only one and when they had less weight classes. I’ll watch the Pavlik fight (actually I’ll d/l it because I can’t sit through HBO’s crappy undercards) but overall, I’m sticking to watching MMA and K-1. As a casual boxing fan, I can’t stand boxing these days.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, boxing is better off now than it was &#8220;back then&#8221;.  Bro, good old days have never existed.  Boxing is at its cleanest right now in history.  I don&#8217;t think there is much of a La Cosa Nostra influence in boxing nowadays.</p>
<p>And here is a little-known fact.  The titles have always been splintered.  Yup, since at least the forties or so.  There was always at least three or so &#8220;world&#8221; champs in each weight class.  It wasn&#8217;t as big of a cluster fuck as today, but still.  I think the best source for rankings and champs is Ring Magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46976</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 17:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46976</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it is just a fantasy that there would be only one undisputed world champion in each weight class with one unified sanctioning body. That is unfortunate. Because right now we have UFC champions but there are guys outside of the UFC who could pose a challenge (Fedor vs. Big Nog/Sylvia and the top Japanese/Brazilian LWs in K-1/DREAMS/WVR vs Penn/Sherk. Even in the divisions where the UFC is dominant, who wouldn&#039;t want to see the top non-UFC fighters at 205, 185 and 170 fight the UFC champs for a unified world belt?). Hence why a unified world belt is appealing. But yeah, I can understand the concern about the unrealistic probability of their being only one sanctioning bodies. That is the only way that I&#039;d accept the possibility of international sanctioning bodies, if there is only ONE. If we had the WBC, WBA, IBO, etc. crap, we&#039;d be in an even worse position than we started.

As for boxing, we could only hope they unify the sanctioning bodies. :( Things were a lot better in boxing when there was only one and when they had less weight classes. I&#039;ll watch the Pavlik fight (actually I&#039;ll d/l it because I can&#039;t sit through HBO&#039;s crappy undercards) but overall, I&#039;m sticking to watching MMA and K-1. As a casual boxing fan, I can&#039;t stand boxing these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it is just a fantasy that there would be only one undisputed world champion in each weight class with one unified sanctioning body. That is unfortunate. Because right now we have UFC champions but there are guys outside of the UFC who could pose a challenge (Fedor vs. Big Nog/Sylvia and the top Japanese/Brazilian LWs in K-1/DREAMS/WVR vs Penn/Sherk. Even in the divisions where the UFC is dominant, who wouldn&#8217;t want to see the top non-UFC fighters at 205, 185 and 170 fight the UFC champs for a unified world belt?). Hence why a unified world belt is appealing. But yeah, I can understand the concern about the unrealistic probability of their being only one sanctioning bodies. That is the only way that I&#8217;d accept the possibility of international sanctioning bodies, if there is only ONE. If we had the WBC, WBA, IBO, etc. crap, we&#8217;d be in an even worse position than we started.</p>
<p>As for boxing, we could only hope they unify the sanctioning bodies. <img src='http://www.fightopinion.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Things were a lot better in boxing when there was only one and when they had less weight classes. I&#8217;ll watch the Pavlik fight (actually I&#8217;ll d/l it because I can&#8217;t sit through HBO&#8217;s crappy undercards) but overall, I&#8217;m sticking to watching MMA and K-1. As a casual boxing fan, I can&#8217;t stand boxing these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46943</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46943</guid>
		<description>The fantasy version of a uniform sanctioning body is a nice idea, but in practice, most of the international sanctioning bodies in other sports are simultaneously corrupt and tyrannical.

Could it happen?  Maybe, but the outlook is not good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fantasy version of a uniform sanctioning body is a nice idea, but in practice, most of the international sanctioning bodies in other sports are simultaneously corrupt and tyrannical.</p>
<p>Could it happen?  Maybe, but the outlook is not good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46932</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46932</guid>
		<description>Hell no!  One sanctioning body wouldn&#039;t be too bad I guess, but what would stop other folks from forming their own sanctioning bodies?  People have agendas you know.  Have you ever heard of the WAA?  The World Athletic Association?  it was formed by Sean O&#039;Grady&#039;s father just to give his son a title.  Check it out, go to Wikipedia if you have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell no!  One sanctioning body wouldn&#8217;t be too bad I guess, but what would stop other folks from forming their own sanctioning bodies?  People have agendas you know.  Have you ever heard of the WAA?  The World Athletic Association?  it was formed by Sean O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s father just to give his son a title.  Check it out, go to Wikipedia if you have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46914</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 23:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46914</guid>
		<description>&quot;UGH!! Seriously?!?! You want sanctioning bodies in boxing?! WHY?!?! They are ruining the sport, and it would be the same thing all over again if it happened in MMA.&quot;

I don&#039;t see anything wrong with the idea of an independent sanctioning body in boxing or MMA. Having ONE Unified international Sanctioning Body in MMA would settle once and for all who are the real #1 fighters in each weight class. The UFC have the majority of the elite fighters in the world but they are not the only game in town with elite fighters. Would you prefer the current system instead where the only champions recognized in the world are club champions for each promotion?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;UGH!! Seriously?!?! You want sanctioning bodies in boxing?! WHY?!?! They are ruining the sport, and it would be the same thing all over again if it happened in MMA.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see anything wrong with the idea of an independent sanctioning body in boxing or MMA. Having ONE Unified international Sanctioning Body in MMA would settle once and for all who are the real #1 fighters in each weight class. The UFC have the majority of the elite fighters in the world but they are not the only game in town with elite fighters. Would you prefer the current system instead where the only champions recognized in the world are club champions for each promotion?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46899</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46899</guid>
		<description>&quot;world belts given out by independent sanctioning bodies.. the issue though is that they all need to unify into one sanctioning body, etc.)&quot;

UGH!!  Seriously?!?!  You want sanctioning bodies in boxing?!  WHY?!?!  They are ruining the sport, and it would be the same thing all over again if it happened in MMA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;world belts given out by independent sanctioning bodies.. the issue though is that they all need to unify into one sanctioning body, etc.)&#8221;</p>
<p>UGH!!  Seriously?!?!  You want sanctioning bodies in boxing?!  WHY?!?!  They are ruining the sport, and it would be the same thing all over again if it happened in MMA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave2</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46882</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 14:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46882</guid>
		<description>I love how Dana does everything in his power to try to distance himself from boxing. But then they go ahead and take pages out of boxing&#039;s play book. Just because the state of boxing sucks now doesn&#039;t mean that some of the things boxing does can&#039;t be great to adopt (ie. 24/7 shows, superior production values, being on HBO instead of SpikeTV, co-promotions, world belts given out by independent sanctioning bodies.. the issue though is that they all need to unify into one sanctioning body, etc.)

The UFC can learn a lot from boxing. They just need to avoid the stuff that hurt boxing. HBO PPV revenue beat UFC in 2007 but seriously, as a casual fan of boxing, I can&#039;t sit through a boxing PPV these days. Mayweather is boring and the undercards suck. I prefer Pavlik to Mayweather any day. MMA and K-1 events (which I&#039;ve recently started following) are much more entertaining than boxing currently by a long shot. I don&#039;t understand how boxing fans can seriously say that MMA is boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how Dana does everything in his power to try to distance himself from boxing. But then they go ahead and take pages out of boxing&#8217;s play book. Just because the state of boxing sucks now doesn&#8217;t mean that some of the things boxing does can&#8217;t be great to adopt (ie. 24/7 shows, superior production values, being on HBO instead of SpikeTV, co-promotions, world belts given out by independent sanctioning bodies.. the issue though is that they all need to unify into one sanctioning body, etc.)</p>
<p>The UFC can learn a lot from boxing. They just need to avoid the stuff that hurt boxing. HBO PPV revenue beat UFC in 2007 but seriously, as a casual fan of boxing, I can&#8217;t sit through a boxing PPV these days. Mayweather is boring and the undercards suck. I prefer Pavlik to Mayweather any day. MMA and K-1 events (which I&#8217;ve recently started following) are much more entertaining than boxing currently by a long shot. I don&#8217;t understand how boxing fans can seriously say that MMA is boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46871</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 05:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46871</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really liking the &quot;re-vamped&quot; countdown show for UFC 81.  It&#039;s a bit more 24/7-ish styled and more up close and personal.

I really think they need to do more &quot;All Access&quot; shows for guys &#039;on the road&#039; to the event.  Create some more hype and give some substance to the fighters outside of they wear an affliction t-shirt and drink energy drinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really liking the &#8220;re-vamped&#8221; countdown show for UFC 81.  It&#8217;s a bit more 24/7-ish styled and more up close and personal.</p>
<p>I really think they need to do more &#8220;All Access&#8221; shows for guys &#8216;on the road&#8217; to the event.  Create some more hype and give some substance to the fighters outside of they wear an affliction t-shirt and drink energy drinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IceMuncher</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46865</link>
		<dc:creator>IceMuncher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 03:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46865</guid>
		<description>I read through the ABC, and I honestly didn&#039;t see much to attack the UFC on.  They seem to be following almost all the rules.  The only stick-up may be the &quot;coersive provisions&quot;, but the term is not defined (I&#039;d go so far as to say intentionally vague), and 100% legal as long as it doesn&#039;t exceed a 12 month period.  

As an aside, there&#039;s one thing that really hit home after reading it:  I hate legislation and the legislators that create it.  My God, what an obtuse document.  It&#039;s so vague that I&#039;m not sure how enforceable it would be if anyone brought it to court.  Lawyers could argue the interpretations of the terms long past the point that it would do any good if you won your case.

...besides, it&#039;s not like it&#039;s going to revolutionize the way the UFC does business any more than it effected boxing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read through the ABC, and I honestly didn&#8217;t see much to attack the UFC on.  They seem to be following almost all the rules.  The only stick-up may be the &#8220;coersive provisions&#8221;, but the term is not defined (I&#8217;d go so far as to say intentionally vague), and 100% legal as long as it doesn&#8217;t exceed a 12 month period.  </p>
<p>As an aside, there&#8217;s one thing that really hit home after reading it:  I hate legislation and the legislators that create it.  My God, what an obtuse document.  It&#8217;s so vague that I&#8217;m not sure how enforceable it would be if anyone brought it to court.  Lawyers could argue the interpretations of the terms long past the point that it would do any good if you won your case.</p>
<p>&#8230;besides, it&#8217;s not like it&#8217;s going to revolutionize the way the UFC does business any more than it effected boxing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/comment-page-1/#comment-46854</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 23:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2008/01/31/thursday-trash-talk-more-ufc-in-the-uk/#comment-46854</guid>
		<description>&quot;If he thinks that politicians instead of courts are going to extend the provisions of that law to MMA, then he’s going to be waiting a long long time.&quot;

You&#039;re right.  This is the type of thing that will be &quot;read-in&quot; to include mma fighters by a judge or require some common-law formulaic test.  That is if anyone ever brings a case against a promoter under this Act.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If he thinks that politicians instead of courts are going to extend the provisions of that law to MMA, then he’s going to be waiting a long long time.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right.  This is the type of thing that will be &#8220;read-in&#8221; to include mma fighters by a judge or require some common-law formulaic test.  That is if anyone ever brings a case against a promoter under this Act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

