Comments on: Vanishing Xyience http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:43:02 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Aaron Crossen http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45816 Aaron Crossen Thu, 03 Jan 2008 18:00:39 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45816 The term has long been in common usage to refer to a stable company, although its technical definition in particular usage might be somewhat different. Watch CNBC or Bloomberg or something for 20 or so minutes and you'll see both uses. The term has long been in common usage to refer to a stable company, although its technical definition in particular usage might be somewhat different. Watch CNBC or Bloomberg or something for 20 or so minutes and you’ll see both uses.

]]> By: Chuck http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45786 Chuck Thu, 03 Jan 2008 04:04:23 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45786 From dictionary.com: "blue chip A very high quality investment involving a lower-than-average risk of loss of principal or reduction in income. The term is generally used to refer to securities of companies having a long history of sustained earnings and dividend payments." So, was Aaron right? This seems deeper than just some succesful company. The other definitions I checked were similar to this one. From dictionary.com:

“blue chip

A very high quality investment involving a lower-than-average risk of loss of principal or reduction in income. The term is generally used to refer to securities of companies having a long history of sustained earnings and dividend payments.”

So, was Aaron right? This seems deeper than just some succesful company. The other definitions I checked were similar to this one.

]]> By: Aaron Crossen http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45771 Aaron Crossen Wed, 02 Jan 2008 22:52:07 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45771 Michael, I never bought it either. That's why I labeled it high school lore. But if you talk to your more fashionable friends, they'll all tell you that men wear watches on their left hands, period, no questions asked. El Samurai, if a post I made in jest on FightOpinion derails my career, I'll get ahold of you so I can buy you a drink. Michael, I never bought it either. That’s why I labeled it high school lore. But if you talk to your more fashionable friends, they’ll all tell you that men wear watches on their left hands, period, no questions asked.

El Samurai, if a post I made in jest on FightOpinion derails my career, I’ll get ahold of you so I can buy you a drink.

]]> By: Aaron Crossen http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45764 Aaron Crossen Wed, 02 Jan 2008 21:10:59 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45764 Chuck, it's blue chip. It refers to a well-established company, like Coca Cola. Chuck, it’s blue chip. It refers to a well-established company, like Coca Cola.

]]> By: Chuck http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45725 Chuck Wed, 02 Jan 2008 07:40:32 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45725 I think Aaron confused watches for earings. And it's blue collar, not blue "chip". I think Aaron confused watches for earings. And it’s blue collar, not blue “chip”.

]]> By: Michaelthebox http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45632 Michaelthebox Tue, 01 Jan 2008 01:33:06 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45632 Aaron Crossen: that seems like nonsense that gay people wear their watch on their right hand. The obvious answer is that the watch is worn on the non-dominant hand, or whichever hand you don't write with. Oh, speaking of homosexual undertones though, I’ve been thinking GSP’s corner for the past two fights have been hilariously ambiguously gay. Aaron Crossen: that seems like nonsense that gay people wear their watch on their right hand. The obvious answer is that the watch is worn on the non-dominant hand, or whichever hand you don’t write with.

Oh, speaking of homosexual undertones though, I’ve been thinking GSP’s corner for the past two fights have been hilariously ambiguously gay.

]]> By: betonmmafights.com http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45630 betonmmafights.com Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:46:28 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45630 did anyone watch the ufc 79 pre fight hype on their website? joe rogan was looking rough as hell like he'd just been on a three week binge did anyone watch the ufc 79 pre fight hype on their website? joe rogan was looking rough as hell like he’d just been on a three week binge

]]> By: Amy Robinson http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45629 Amy Robinson Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:27:59 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45629 Nope, no fighters with Xyience logos, mostly because most of their former fighters left them because of non-payment. As for homosexual undertones, I've always wondered about Joe Rogan. Not that there's anything wrong with that though. Nope, no fighters with Xyience logos, mostly because most of their former fighters left them because of non-payment.

As for homosexual undertones, I’ve always wondered about Joe Rogan. Not that there’s anything wrong with that though.

]]> By: doem http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45628 doem Mon, 31 Dec 2007 23:21:00 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45628 i think gsp also had affliction on his Gi. but advertising on Gi is not really anything new i think gsp also had affliction on his Gi. but advertising on Gi is not really anything new

]]> By: betonmmafights.com http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/comment-page-1/#comment-45626 betonmmafights.com Mon, 31 Dec 2007 22:59:51 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/12/31/vanishing-xyience/#comment-45626 yeah lol i think a few fighters who have their own custom shirts okay maybe that's cool but for everyone to wear affliction it's like the last trend with xyience and we all saw how that went yeah lol i think a few fighters who have their own custom shirts okay maybe that’s cool but for everyone to wear affliction it’s like the last trend with xyience and we all saw how that went

]]>