<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UFC will not strip Sean Sherk of Lightweight title</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: white ninja</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40573</link>
		<dc:creator>white ninja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 12:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40573</guid>
		<description>rationalise it all you want - something tells me that the mainstream media isnt going to buy into this one

dana is making a big mistake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rationalise it all you want &#8211; something tells me that the mainstream media isnt going to buy into this one</p>
<p>dana is making a big mistake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40569</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy (not that Jeremy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40569</guid>
		<description>Sherk is guilty of what he&#039;s accused of: failing to provide a test that would come back clean.

Dana&#039;s being stupid saying that he won&#039;t strip the title, but at this point, really can you blame him?  That fight was in fucking JULY!  By the time they get to the next continued appeal date, it will have been four months since the fight.  The suspension started back then.  Do you really think he&#039;s going to bother vacating the title for eight months?  It&#039;s not worth the effort, he can&#039;t even line up the fights to establish a new champion in the time it will take for Sherk to be back in the cage.

There was no reason to give them until Halloween, and the idea that they needed MORE time is just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sherk is guilty of what he&#8217;s accused of: failing to provide a test that would come back clean.</p>
<p>Dana&#8217;s being stupid saying that he won&#8217;t strip the title, but at this point, really can you blame him?  That fight was in fucking JULY!  By the time they get to the next continued appeal date, it will have been four months since the fight.  The suspension started back then.  Do you really think he&#8217;s going to bother vacating the title for eight months?  It&#8217;s not worth the effort, he can&#8217;t even line up the fights to establish a new champion in the time it will take for Sherk to be back in the cage.</p>
<p>There was no reason to give them until Halloween, and the idea that they needed MORE time is just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmp</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40561</link>
		<dc:creator>dmp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 06:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40561</guid>
		<description>The CSAC looks really bad right now.  What a bunch of screw ups.  Franca has to kicking himself for being honest about what he did.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CSAC looks really bad right now.  What a bunch of screw ups.  Franca has to kicking himself for being honest about what he did.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JThue</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40555</link>
		<dc:creator>JThue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40555</guid>
		<description>I say Stevenson-Penn may still be for THE belt, as this is Dana&#039;s reaction right after the CSAC mess and he clearly wanted to just get it over with and announce the title fight already. Regardless it makes little difference as the champ, interim or not, will next fight sometime in the spring at earliest, and Sherk&#039;s suspension will be up by then(there is no way it hell it isn&#039;t getting reduced). It&#039;s depressing as hell, but that&#039;s how it goes.

Really when you take a step back and look at it, this isn&#039;t such a bombastic move by Dana White. So what if Sherk keeps the belt - that was White&#039;s call to make anyway, and he isn&#039;t keeping the belt on Sherk because of or in spite of the CSAC, he&#039;s keeping the belt on Sherk because he believes his buddy is innocent, simply on account of being his buddy. So *IF* the statement of the week remains Dana White&#039;s stance, the outcome, in the end, will be no different from what it would have been if he had said nothing. Again, because Sherk is absolutely not, realistically, on a 12-month suspension, and even though Dana White is all mad about the CSAC, ******he is not actually doing- or threatening to do anything that goes against their ruling****** 

Yes it is a HUGE issue that Dana White will take a fighter&#039;s word over a drug test result, but that is also old news by now. Nothing new here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say Stevenson-Penn may still be for THE belt, as this is Dana&#8217;s reaction right after the CSAC mess and he clearly wanted to just get it over with and announce the title fight already. Regardless it makes little difference as the champ, interim or not, will next fight sometime in the spring at earliest, and Sherk&#8217;s suspension will be up by then(there is no way it hell it isn&#8217;t getting reduced). It&#8217;s depressing as hell, but that&#8217;s how it goes.</p>
<p>Really when you take a step back and look at it, this isn&#8217;t such a bombastic move by Dana White. So what if Sherk keeps the belt &#8211; that was White&#8217;s call to make anyway, and he isn&#8217;t keeping the belt on Sherk because of or in spite of the CSAC, he&#8217;s keeping the belt on Sherk because he believes his buddy is innocent, simply on account of being his buddy. So *IF* the statement of the week remains Dana White&#8217;s stance, the outcome, in the end, will be no different from what it would have been if he had said nothing. Again, because Sherk is absolutely not, realistically, on a 12-month suspension, and even though Dana White is all mad about the CSAC, ******he is not actually doing- or threatening to do anything that goes against their ruling****** </p>
<p>Yes it is a HUGE issue that Dana White will take a fighter&#8217;s word over a drug test result, but that is also old news by now. Nothing new here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fan Futbol</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40552</link>
		<dc:creator>Fan Futbol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40552</guid>
		<description>Grape Knee High is right.  Even if Sherk were suspended (and stripped by the UFC), he&#039;d get the shot at the winner of Penn-Stevenson as soon as he returned.  Of course, that Garcia mishandled the hearing briefs is absolutely ludicrous.  That does not speak well of CSAC&#039;s competence.  

Nonetheless, if the CSAC does find Sherk used steroids, White would be a fool not to strip him.  It&#039;s not like Sherk sells a lot of tickets/buys -- certainly not more than the likely new champ, Penn, or even Tuffer Stevenson -- and White would get the PR benefit of looking tough on performance enhancers.  The argument that Sherk&#039;s roid use was proven only when he was defending the title (rather than when he won it) is a technicality that White should dispense with.  Use of roids should result in loss of the belt.


FF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grape Knee High is right.  Even if Sherk were suspended (and stripped by the UFC), he&#8217;d get the shot at the winner of Penn-Stevenson as soon as he returned.  Of course, that Garcia mishandled the hearing briefs is absolutely ludicrous.  That does not speak well of CSAC&#8217;s competence.  </p>
<p>Nonetheless, if the CSAC does find Sherk used steroids, White would be a fool not to strip him.  It&#8217;s not like Sherk sells a lot of tickets/buys &#8212; certainly not more than the likely new champ, Penn, or even Tuffer Stevenson &#8212; and White would get the PR benefit of looking tough on performance enhancers.  The argument that Sherk&#8217;s roid use was proven only when he was defending the title (rather than when he won it) is a technicality that White should dispense with.  Use of roids should result in loss of the belt.</p>
<p>FF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cyphron</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40548</link>
		<dc:creator>cyphron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40548</guid>
		<description>Dana&#039;s a idiot. I predict he will recant what he said once Sherk is found guilty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dana&#8217;s a idiot. I predict he will recant what he said once Sherk is found guilty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynchman</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40547</link>
		<dc:creator>lynchman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40547</guid>
		<description>This does not mean that Dana is declaring war. If he used Sherk in a show while Sherk was suspended, that would be a war declaration.

I think that Dana should have said nothing until this was decided.

Garcia did indeed fuck up by not handing out of the defense briefing like he was supposed to. That is the cause of the current delay and makes them look amateur.

If all of the paperwork is found, I don&#039;t see how Sherk will get off/ If some of the paper trail continues to remain unfound, Sherk may indeed get off. Some of it turned up on Wed, but not all of it. If they can&#039;t account for the sample every step of the way, it does make it easier to assume it might have been tainted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not mean that Dana is declaring war. If he used Sherk in a show while Sherk was suspended, that would be a war declaration.</p>
<p>I think that Dana should have said nothing until this was decided.</p>
<p>Garcia did indeed fuck up by not handing out of the defense briefing like he was supposed to. That is the cause of the current delay and makes them look amateur.</p>
<p>If all of the paperwork is found, I don&#8217;t see how Sherk will get off/ If some of the paper trail continues to remain unfound, Sherk may indeed get off. Some of it turned up on Wed, but not all of it. If they can&#8217;t account for the sample every step of the way, it does make it easier to assume it might have been tainted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zack</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40544</link>
		<dc:creator>Zack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40544</guid>
		<description>Oh delicious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh delicious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40534</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40534</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s still all a bit of a farce.

What’s the difference whether Sherk has the “official” belt or not? Even if Sherk got stripped, everyone knows damn well he would have gotten first crack at the winner of Penn/Stevenson anyway.&quot;

I&#039;m inclined to agree with Grape - the second he comes off his suspension, he would be &quot;fighting to get his title back&quot; had he been stripped.

I find it humourous that they&#039;re so ardently standing behind Sherk, but they want nothing to do with Barnett who was in an identical situation....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s still all a bit of a farce.</p>
<p>What’s the difference whether Sherk has the “official” belt or not? Even if Sherk got stripped, everyone knows damn well he would have gotten first crack at the winner of Penn/Stevenson anyway.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m inclined to agree with Grape &#8211; the second he comes off his suspension, he would be &#8220;fighting to get his title back&#8221; had he been stripped.</p>
<p>I find it humourous that they&#8217;re so ardently standing behind Sherk, but they want nothing to do with Barnett who was in an identical situation&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Gaijin</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/comment-page-1/#comment-40533</link>
		<dc:creator>The Gaijin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/11/02/ufc-will-not-strip-sean-sherk-of-lightweight-title/#comment-40533</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s a very questionable move.&quot;

Oh I don&#039;t doubt that in the least - I was just saying, it&#039;s pretty ballsy b/c this could either be the stand that needs to be taken against a clearly inept commission or it will blow up in his face (regardless of the nobility of his reasons).

Sherk got caught cheating red-handed thats something I&#039;m certain of.  His ratios were completely off the charts, like 12:1 rather than the normal 2:1 (I&#039;ve tried and eff&#039;d up the math enough times that I will say that he was far higher than one should be - even factoring for genetics and intense training).  So even if he did have &quot;tainted supplements&quot;, I&#039;m sorry but I find it impossible to have ingested supps that were &quot;tainted&quot; so much that they gave him the results he pissed out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s a very questionable move.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh I don&#8217;t doubt that in the least &#8211; I was just saying, it&#8217;s pretty ballsy b/c this could either be the stand that needs to be taken against a clearly inept commission or it will blow up in his face (regardless of the nobility of his reasons).</p>
<p>Sherk got caught cheating red-handed thats something I&#8217;m certain of.  His ratios were completely off the charts, like 12:1 rather than the normal 2:1 (I&#8217;ve tried and eff&#8217;d up the math enough times that I will say that he was far higher than one should be &#8211; even factoring for genetics and intense training).  So even if he did have &#8220;tainted supplements&#8221;, I&#8217;m sorry but I find it impossible to have ingested supps that were &#8220;tainted&#8221; so much that they gave him the results he pissed out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

