<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Friday chalkboard: ESPN&#8217;s wall-to-wall UFC coverage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:47:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: FightOpinion.com - Your Global Connection to the Fight Industry.</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-41519</link>
		<dc:creator>FightOpinion.com - Your Global Connection to the Fight Industry.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 07:45:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-41519</guid>
		<description>[...] the formation of the WAMMA sanctioning body - Lou DiBella was in attendance. Yes, that Lou DiBella, who got crushed on ESPN&#8217;s SportsCenter program by Joe Rogan in a boxing vs. MMA debate during the heat-up for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the formation of the WAMMA sanctioning body &#8211; Lou DiBella was in attendance. Yes, that Lou DiBella, who got crushed on ESPN&#8217;s SportsCenter program by Joe Rogan in a boxing vs. MMA debate during the heat-up for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chairibofjustice</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25892</link>
		<dc:creator>chairibofjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 20:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25892</guid>
		<description>They&#039;ve banned all the old school MMA sites from attending the UFC, not just Sherdog, and they&#039;ve never given a good reason hell ANY reason for it either.  

The simple fact is that Zuffa and the UFC used the publicity from sites like Sherdog and MMAWeekly until they didn&#039;t need it any more.  This sport is one that survived solely because of sites like those and hell even the UG too, when the cable ban was still going on and the UFC was taking place in some inbred hillbilly town somewhere in Louisiana.  Do you even remember the cable ban?  Hell how many of you even remember when Zuffa decided to ban the MMA site from reporting on the UFC.  

As soon as thought they were going to be mainstream they dropped those guys like a stone and started feeding the mainstream guys their B.S.  You guys do remember all the pro-Zuffa propaganda that&#039;s come out in the past couple of years since the ban?  Why would they do that?  

Because they could, mainstream guys are boxing hacks who don&#039;t know shit about the sport and lack the critical mind to even examine what they are being spoon fed.  Besides, why would a mainstream guy even try to rock the boat when they&#039;re given access to these events.  

But if you guys really want to bitch about spoilers, well I guess that&#039;s up to you.  But honestly that&#039;s a pretty lame excuse about justifying the ban.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve banned all the old school MMA sites from attending the UFC, not just Sherdog, and they&#8217;ve never given a good reason hell ANY reason for it either.  </p>
<p>The simple fact is that Zuffa and the UFC used the publicity from sites like Sherdog and MMAWeekly until they didn&#8217;t need it any more.  This sport is one that survived solely because of sites like those and hell even the UG too, when the cable ban was still going on and the UFC was taking place in some inbred hillbilly town somewhere in Louisiana.  Do you even remember the cable ban?  Hell how many of you even remember when Zuffa decided to ban the MMA site from reporting on the UFC.  </p>
<p>As soon as thought they were going to be mainstream they dropped those guys like a stone and started feeding the mainstream guys their B.S.  You guys do remember all the pro-Zuffa propaganda that&#8217;s come out in the past couple of years since the ban?  Why would they do that?  </p>
<p>Because they could, mainstream guys are boxing hacks who don&#8217;t know shit about the sport and lack the critical mind to even examine what they are being spoon fed.  Besides, why would a mainstream guy even try to rock the boat when they&#8217;re given access to these events.  </p>
<p>But if you guys really want to bitch about spoilers, well I guess that&#8217;s up to you.  But honestly that&#8217;s a pretty lame excuse about justifying the ban.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Rowles</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25871</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Rowles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25871</guid>
		<description>I second 45 Huddle&#039;s position on Sherdog.  I accidentally went there on the Saturday of UFC 70, only to have Cro Cop&#039;s upset totally spoiled.  I mean, they can post all the spoilers they want, but why not have the decency to have a disclaimer?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second 45 Huddle&#8217;s position on Sherdog.  I accidentally went there on the Saturday of UFC 70, only to have Cro Cop&#8217;s upset totally spoiled.  I mean, they can post all the spoilers they want, but why not have the decency to have a disclaimer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25854</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 11:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25854</guid>
		<description>In the UFC&#039;s defense of banning Sherdog.com, it is the same website that completely spoiled UFC 70, as well as gave out the results of the TUF4 Finalists like 3 shows into the season.  They have acted like amateur journalists to this point, and the UFC has treated them as such.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the UFC&#8217;s defense of banning Sherdog.com, it is the same website that completely spoiled UFC 70, as well as gave out the results of the TUF4 Finalists like 3 shows into the season.  They have acted like amateur journalists to this point, and the UFC has treated them as such.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Det</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25853</link>
		<dc:creator>Det</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 10:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25853</guid>
		<description>The ESPN website has an article up on fedor and one with the news from Japan by Jordan Breen. While the tv coverage will no doubt be on UFC the day before the event (what a shocker) atleast the web part has more diverse content thanks to sherdog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ESPN website has an article up on fedor and one with the news from Japan by Jordan Breen. While the tv coverage will no doubt be on UFC the day before the event (what a shocker) atleast the web part has more diverse content thanks to sherdog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chairibofjustice</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25832</link>
		<dc:creator>chairibofjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 04:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25832</guid>
		<description>&quot;Oh, and get ready for the new wave of MMA â€œexpertsâ€ who will be popping up: Old boxing writers who will be giving us their uninformed analysis of the fights.&quot;

And how is that any different from what we have now?  The majority of people that cover the sport in the mainstream areas are boxing hacks who really don&#039;t understand what they are watching.

MMA Idiots are a plenty when you&#039;re dealing with journalists from the LA Times, Yahoo, CBS Sportsline, SI, and now ESPN.  And the saddest thing is that these twists get to actually attend the UFC.  While Dana White decided to ban guys like Sherdog and MMAWeekly.com a couple of years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and get ready for the new wave of MMA â€œexpertsâ€ who will be popping up: Old boxing writers who will be giving us their uninformed analysis of the fights.&#8221;</p>
<p>And how is that any different from what we have now?  The majority of people that cover the sport in the mainstream areas are boxing hacks who really don&#8217;t understand what they are watching.</p>
<p>MMA Idiots are a plenty when you&#8217;re dealing with journalists from the LA Times, Yahoo, CBS Sportsline, SI, and now ESPN.  And the saddest thing is that these twists get to actually attend the UFC.  While Dana White decided to ban guys like Sherdog and MMAWeekly.com a couple of years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rolo the Cat</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25831</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolo the Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 03:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25831</guid>
		<description>Anyone else think tomorrow could be a bad day for the UFC.  I mean if Chuck loses.  He is the face of the UFC and incredibly popular.  A lose for Chuck, which is likely, is a promotional setback in my opinion.  Add to that the fact that I really hate Rampage, and I don&#039;t even want to watch.

I have been watching since UFC 1 and always viewed things very technically and stayed detached.  Now that it is big business, I am getting drawn in to the other aspects, and the fun isn&#039;t there.

Oh, and get ready for the new wave of MMA &quot;experts&quot; who will be popping up:  Old boxing writers who will be giving us their uninformed analysis of the fights.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else think tomorrow could be a bad day for the UFC.  I mean if Chuck loses.  He is the face of the UFC and incredibly popular.  A lose for Chuck, which is likely, is a promotional setback in my opinion.  Add to that the fact that I really hate Rampage, and I don&#8217;t even want to watch.</p>
<p>I have been watching since UFC 1 and always viewed things very technically and stayed detached.  Now that it is big business, I am getting drawn in to the other aspects, and the fun isn&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>Oh, and get ready for the new wave of MMA &#8220;experts&#8221; who will be popping up:  Old boxing writers who will be giving us their uninformed analysis of the fights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euthyphro</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25830</link>
		<dc:creator>Euthyphro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 03:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25830</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;On ESPN TV today, they used â€œultimate fightingâ€ rather than MMA most of the time. It was remarkable to watch how UFC got all the coverage and no other MMA players got much notice, if any.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Zach, might I ask what&#039;s remarkable about this? It&#039;s the day before one of the bigger matchups in UFC history, and they&#039;re using the event as a springboard to introduce MMA coverage. Things like their chevrons reading &quot;boxing vs ultimate fighting&quot; are problematic, but their partnership with sherdog on the website, and the coverage of shooto, etc bodes well for the future. For now, sure they&#039;ll only cover the UFC on TV. You don&#039;t see SportsCenter showing minor league baseball unless something amazing happens in a game. As of right now, all other domestic players are small-time compared to the UFC. Why would they be covered on SC? Do any of the mid-size orgs even have cards going on this weekend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>On ESPN TV today, they used â€œultimate fightingâ€ rather than MMA most of the time. It was remarkable to watch how UFC got all the coverage and no other MMA players got much notice, if any.</p></blockquote>
<p>Zach, might I ask what&#8217;s remarkable about this? It&#8217;s the day before one of the bigger matchups in UFC history, and they&#8217;re using the event as a springboard to introduce MMA coverage. Things like their chevrons reading &#8220;boxing vs ultimate fighting&#8221; are problematic, but their partnership with sherdog on the website, and the coverage of shooto, etc bodes well for the future. For now, sure they&#8217;ll only cover the UFC on TV. You don&#8217;t see SportsCenter showing minor league baseball unless something amazing happens in a game. As of right now, all other domestic players are small-time compared to the UFC. Why would they be covered on SC? Do any of the mid-size orgs even have cards going on this weekend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 45 Huddle</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25829</link>
		<dc:creator>45 Huddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 03:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25829</guid>
		<description>I doubt it will be covered like the UFC.  I would be surprised if they had more then 20 seconds worth of clips, but most likely no coverage at all.

And it is true that only the UFC has blown up in America.  They have become the biggest name in Europe, easily having bigger gates then any competition.  Their upcoming Ireland card was less then 1,000 tickets from being sold out as of last week.  They are the biggest in North America by far.  The only market they have left to conquer in Asia, and Japan alone is going to be tough.  Heck, MMA in general is on a downward slope in the country.

By the way, I just caught SportCenter.  The announcer was butchering the talking.  He said it was a Heavyweight fight for Liddell/Rampage.  He kept on studdering.  You could tell he didn&#039;t know what he was talking about.  One of the other sports casters in the background kept on butting in, cause you could tell her was a fan.  It was funny.

Either way, it was great exposure.  They are giving the rules of the sport.  They are educating the general public.  If nothing else, this will give the UFC staying power.  It will keep them in the public&#039;s eye on a monthly basis.  That is such power for one organization to have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt it will be covered like the UFC.  I would be surprised if they had more then 20 seconds worth of clips, but most likely no coverage at all.</p>
<p>And it is true that only the UFC has blown up in America.  They have become the biggest name in Europe, easily having bigger gates then any competition.  Their upcoming Ireland card was less then 1,000 tickets from being sold out as of last week.  They are the biggest in North America by far.  The only market they have left to conquer in Asia, and Japan alone is going to be tough.  Heck, MMA in general is on a downward slope in the country.</p>
<p>By the way, I just caught SportCenter.  The announcer was butchering the talking.  He said it was a Heavyweight fight for Liddell/Rampage.  He kept on studdering.  You could tell he didn&#8217;t know what he was talking about.  One of the other sports casters in the background kept on butting in, cause you could tell her was a fan.  It was funny.</p>
<p>Either way, it was great exposure.  They are giving the rules of the sport.  They are educating the general public.  If nothing else, this will give the UFC staying power.  It will keep them in the public&#8217;s eye on a monthly basis.  That is such power for one organization to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Body_Shots</title>
		<link>http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/comment-page-1/#comment-25827</link>
		<dc:creator>Body_Shots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 03:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fightopinion.com/2007/05/25/friday-chalkboard-espns-wall-to-wall-ufc-coverage/#comment-25827</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;UFC is now mainstream in America, not MMA.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree, but lets wait and see how the K1 show is covered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>UFC is now mainstream in America, not MMA.</i></p>
<p>I agree, but lets wait and see how the K1 show is covered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

