Comments on: WFA 7/22 Los Angeles PPV recap http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/ Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:40:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: MMA T-Shirts http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4815 MMA T-Shirts Mon, 24 Jul 2006 18:37:44 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4815 "Jenna Jameson spotted with Tito Ortiz" OMFG WOW.... amazing. Seriously, I can't believe all the attention this has got. 1. She's married. 2. All they were doing was sitting there... he didnt have his massive heed burried in her boobs ffs. 3. Who cares anyway :P Thinking about the event again, their main problem I think is that they have actually signed some top fighters... well, that isnt the problem in itself, the fact that they can only sign a very finite number of top fighters is, which means that if they want to hold on to them, there will be very few fight combinations, if theyre going to be a multi-event promotion. To be honest, I envisage a lot of mismatch / whoopasses from the top few guys they have signed and then nowhere really to go from there. If they had signed a load of B level fighters a-la Cage Rage, it might actually be more interesting, as opposed to like 2 or 3 A level fighters and then a load of fillers. “Jenna Jameson spotted with Tito Ortiz” OMFG WOW…. amazing. Seriously, I can’t believe all the attention this has got.

1. She’s married.
2. All they were doing was sitting there… he didnt have his massive heed burried in her boobs ffs.
3. Who cares anyway :P

Thinking about the event again, their main problem I think is that they have actually signed some top fighters… well, that isnt the problem in itself, the fact that they can only sign a very finite number of top fighters is, which means that if they want to hold on to them, there will be very few fight combinations, if theyre going to be a multi-event promotion.

To be honest, I envisage a lot of mismatch / whoopasses from the top few guys they have signed and then nowhere really to go from there. If they had signed a load of B level fighters a-la Cage Rage, it might actually be more interesting, as opposed to like 2 or 3 A level fighters and then a load of fillers.

]]> By: kevin http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4808 kevin Mon, 24 Jul 2006 17:16:47 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4808 Bad production. The commentary sucked (except for "The Fight Professors"), bad audio, most of the fights were nothing spectacular and a couple of them just sucked. Rampage was not impressive, but Matt was. The Sherdog article is WAY too forgiving (and leaves me wondering what they got in return). Overall, not so good, but I would be willing to purchase the next event, as long as it gets better and not worse. Bad production. The commentary sucked (except for “The Fight Professors”), bad audio, most of the fights were nothing spectacular and a couple of them just sucked. Rampage was not impressive, but Matt was. The Sherdog article is WAY too forgiving (and leaves me wondering what they got in return). Overall, not so good, but I would be willing to purchase the next event, as long as it gets better and not worse.

]]> By: Mr. Roadblock http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4758 Mr. Roadblock Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:49:39 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4758 I thought they did a great job of getting the fights on one after the other. There was no down time on the broadcast. Concise postfight interviews, no silly packages before the fight about how much to the two guys hate each other. The announcers were up and down, but OK. I really enjoyed the show and will definitely watch their next one. I thought they did a great job of getting the fights on one after the other. There was no down time on the broadcast. Concise postfight interviews, no silly packages before the fight about how much to the two guys hate each other. The announcers were up and down, but OK.

I really enjoyed the show and will definitely watch their next one.

]]> By: Paul http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4755 Paul Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:15:07 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4755 The show looked great on PPV! The show looked great on PPV!

]]> By: MMA T-Shirts http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4743 MMA T-Shirts Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:39:59 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4743 I thought it was pretty good in the end... ropey start from the commentators but once they warmed up, the whole thing was decent. mostly good fights too. I thought it was pretty good in the end… ropey start from the commentators but once they warmed up, the whole thing was decent. mostly good fights too.

]]> By: sooperstardj http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4741 sooperstardj Sun, 23 Jul 2006 17:41:21 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4741 How did the show look on television? To anyone that watched it. How did the show look on television? To anyone that watched it.

]]> By: Lynchman http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-4728 Lynchman Sun, 23 Jul 2006 07:05:21 +0000 http://www.fightopinion.com/2006/07/22/wfa-722-los-angeles-ppv-recap/#comment-4728 Not a good start for the WFA. Bad lighting, bad sound, bad fights(mostly) in an empty arena. Not a good start for the WFA. Bad lighting, bad sound, bad fights(mostly) in an empty arena.

]]>